ReviewHerz2021
[Current technologies in interventional treatment of tricuspid valve regurgitation].
Review in Herz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For a long time, severe tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) was an underestimated disease, especially in the older population and was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Due to the high perioperative mortality of tricuspid valve surgery, historically only pharmaceutical treatment was a practical treatment option. In the first studies interventional approaches could achieve promising results with an effective reduction of TR with simultaneous proof of a convincing safety profile. Conceptually, the currently available interventional treatment options can be divided into three concepts: coaptation systems (edge-to-edge repair), annuloplasty and interventional valve replacement. The largest clinical experience and best scientific body of evidence could so far be generated in the field of coaptation systems. Very promising preliminary results with effective reduction of TR and improvement of the clinical symptoms are, however, also available for interventional valve replacement. Meticulous preprocedural diagnostics with selection of the most suitable treatment option for each individual patient is paramount for successful treatment in this critically ill patient cohort. Future prospective randomized studies will investigate the net benefit of an interventional treatment of TR in comparison to a purely conservative treatment concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.