ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2021
Erratum: Fabrication of Zero Mode Waveguides for High Concentration Single Molecule Microscopy.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An erratum was issued for: Fabrication of Zero Mode Waveguides for High Concentration Single Molecule Microscopy. A figure was updated. Figure 3 was updated from: Figure 3: Representative results from evaporative deposition of colloids. (A) Example of optimal colloid deposition. (B) Example of an acceptable colloid deposition in which conditions were more humid (80% RH) than ideal. Holes in the crystal monolayer are apparent. (C) Example of an acceptable colloid deposition in which conditions were drier (65% RH) than optimal. The monolayer regions are slightly translucent while multilayered areas are white and opaque (perimeter and streaks inward). (D) A colloidal crystal illuminated with white light to highlight the rainbow diffraction from the crystals. (E) AFM image (tapping probe AFM in air) of a monolayer of hexagonally packed polystyrene beads from a successful colloid deposition (scale bar = 10 µm). (F) Expanded AFM image of packed beads (scale bar = 2 µm). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure. to: Figure 3: Representative results from evaporative deposition of colloids. (A) Example of optimal colloid deposition. (B) Example of an acceptable colloid deposition in which conditions were more humid (80% RH) than ideal. Holes in the crystal monolayer are apparent. (C) Example of an acceptable colloid deposition in which conditions were drier (65% RH) than optimal. The monolayer regions are slightly translucent while multilayered areas are white and opaque (perimeter and streaks inward). (D) A colloidal crystal illuminated with white light to highlight the rainbow diffraction from the crystals. (E) AFM image (tapping probe AFM in air) of a monolayer of hexagonally packed polystyrene beads from a successful colloid deposition (scale bar = 10 µm). (F) Expanded AFM image of packed beads (scale bar = 2 µm). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Identifiers
34374691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.