ArticleCancer medicine2021
Brain and heart-specific death in cancer patients: Population-based study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PSMD14 in cancers based on bioinformatics and meta-analysis.Future science OA · 2024Review
- Brain and heart-specific death in cancer patients: Population-based study.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe occurrence of cardiovascular events is a major cause of death in patients with cancer. Small studies have documented a connection between specific brain alterations and autonomic cardiac dysfunctions, possibly resulting in a worse prognosis. We aimed to refine the knowledge of fatal cardiac events in patients with brain metastasis (BM).
methodsWe performed a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER registry-based investigation (timeline: 2010-2016) and extracted all the advanced patients who had experienced fatal cardiac outcomes. Populations were compared according to the presence or not BM. Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology was used for survival analysis and a multivariate model was developed by adjusting for multiple possible confounders.
resultsMost related BM and cardiac death were observed at the site of lung cancer (81.4%). We extracted 3187 patients with lung cancer site, including 417 patients who had experienced fatal heart-specific with a history of BM, which is considered a BM group. The second group of heart-specific death included 2770 patients was stated as a non-BM group. Patients who had experienced heart-specific death in the BM group were predominately male, right side, upper site, and non-small type (62.11%, 54.92%, 51.56%, 69.78%), respectively. The survival outcomes between BM and the non- BM was significantly prominent (p = 0.003; median: 2 months vs. 3 months).The negative prognostic independent significance of heart-fatal events was confirmed after adjusting for multiple variables (HR = 0.76, CI = 0.68-84, p < 0.0001). The metastatic liver site was significantly associated with poorer survival rates (HR = 0.68; CI = 0.52-0.88, p = 0.005). We revealed a possible connection between the brain and heart functions.
conclusionsThe prognosis of heart-specific death patients in BM is unfavorable compared to non-BM settings in lung cancer. We may be at the gates of a new field of neurocardiooncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.