Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34374204›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Motivation to move fast, motivation to wait and see: The association of prevention and promotion focus with clinicians' implementation of the JNC-7 hypertension treatment guidelines.

Mechelle Sanders, Kevin Fiscella, Elaine Hill, Olugbenga Ogedegbe, Andrea Cassells, Jonathan N Tobin, Stephen Williams, Peter Veazie

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mechelle SandersDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0340-0179
Kevin FiscellaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Elaine HillDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Olugbenga OgedegbeNYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Andrea CassellsClinical Directors Network Inc, Rockefeller Univ, New York, New York, USA.
Jonathan N TobinClinical Directors Network Inc, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Stephen WilliamsNYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Peter VeazieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
University of Rochester · USNYU Langone Health · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USClinical Directors Network · US

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Sally W Thurston · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
Blood Pressure-Visit Intensification for Successful Improvement of TreatmentR18HL117801 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FISCELLA, KEVIN ANTHONY, TOBIN, JONATHAN N · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R18 HL117801NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Roughly half of the adults in the United States are diagnosed with hypertension (HTN). Unfortunately, less than one-third have their condition under control. Clinicians generally have positive regard for the use of HTN guidelines to achieve HTN treatment goals; however, actual uptake remains low. Factors underpinning clinician variation in practice are poorly understood. To understand the relationship between clinicians' personal motivation to complete goals and their uptake of the Joint National Commission's HTN guidelines. The authors used Regulatory Focus Theory (RFT, ie, prevention and promotion focus), an empirically supported motivational theory, as a guiding framework to examine the relationship. The authors hypothesized that clinicians with high prevention focus would report following guidelines more often and have shorter follow-up visit intervals for patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. Clinicians (n  = 27) caring for adult patients diagnosed with HTN (n = 8605) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (n = 8). Clinicians' prevention and promotion focus scores and the number of days between visits for their patients with uncontrolled systolic blood pressure (SBP) (≥ 140 mm Hg). Consistent with RFT, 60% of prevention focused clinicians reported they always followed the monthly visit guideline for the patients with uncontrolled blood pressure, compared with 38% of promotion focused clinicians (p = .254). The unadjusted probability of returning for a follow-up visit within 30 days was greater among patients whose clinician was higher in prevention focus (p = .009), but there was no evidence at the 0.05 significance level in our adjusted model. These findings provide some limited evidence that RFT is a useful framework to understand clinician adherence to HTN treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

HypertensionMotivationAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansUnited StatesAntihypertensive Agentsclinical management of high blood pressure (HBP)hypertensiontreatment and diagnosis/guidelines

Identifiers

PMID34374204
PMCPMC8463494
OpenAlexW3187244919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.