Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34374154›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2021

Snapshot Wisconsin: networking community scientists and remote sensing to improve ecological monitoring and management.

Philip A Townsend, John D J Clare, Nanfeng Liu, Jennifer L Stenglein, Christine Anhalt-Depies, Timothy R Van Deelen, Neil A Gilbert, Aditya Singh, Karl J Martin, Benjamin Zuckerberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Human disturbance compresses the spatiotemporal niche.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Snapshot Wisconsin: networking community scientists and remote sensing to improve ecological monitoring and management.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philip A TownsendDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-8774
John D J ClareDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2583-8742
Nanfeng LiuDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.
Jennifer L StengleinWisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin, 53707, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-5908
Christine Anhalt-DepiesDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1295-3154
Timothy R Van DeelenDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.
Neil A GilbertDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-5612
Aditya SinghDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32603, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5559-9151
Karl J MartinDivision of Extension, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.
Benjamin ZuckerbergDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7412-4354
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Florida · USWisconsin Department of Natural Resources · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological data collection is entering a new era. Community science, satellite remote sensing (SRS), and local forms of remote sensing (e.g., camera traps and acoustic recordings) have enabled biological data to be collected at unprecedented spatial and temporal scales and resolution. There is growing interest in developing observation networks to collect and synthesize data to improve broad-scale ecological monitoring, but no examples of such networks have emerged to inform decision-making by agencies. Here, we present the implementation of one such jurisdictional observation network (JON), Snapshot Wisconsin, which links synoptic environmental data derived from SRS to biodiversity observations collected continuously from a trail camera network to support management decision-making. We use several examples to illustrate that Snapshot Wisconsin improves the spatial, temporal, and biological resolution and extent of information available to support management, filling gaps associated with traditional monitoring and enabling consideration of new management strategies. JONs like Snapshot Wisconsin further strengthen monitoring inference by contributing novel lines of evidence useful for corroboration or integration. SRS provides environmental context that facilitates inference, prediction, and forecasting, and ultimately helps managers formulate, test, and refine conceptual models for the monitored systems. Although these approaches pose challenges, Snapshot Wisconsin demonstrates that expansive observation networks can be tractably managed by agencies to support decision making, providing a powerful new tool for agencies to better achieve their missions and reshape the nature of environmental decision-making.

Indexed as

BiodiversityRemote Sensing TechnologyEnvironmental MonitoringModels, TheoreticalWisconsinblack bearbobcatcamera trapcitizen scienceLandsatmanagement agencyMODISobservation networkremote sensingtrail cameraswhite-tailed deerwildlife

Identifiers

PMID34374154
PMCPMC9286556
OpenAlexW3190448359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.