Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34374082›Full record

Trial reportCancer2021

Racial differences in survival and response to therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A secondary analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance A151931).

Rebecca A Snyder, Jun He, Jennifer Le-Rademacher, Fang-Shu Ou, Andrew B Dodge, Tyler J Zemla, Electra D Paskett, George J Chang, Federico Innocenti, Charles Blanke and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Healthcare Disparities and Colorectal Cancer.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2026.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca A SnyderDepartment of Surgery and Public Health, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-2485-2481
Jun HeAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jennifer Le-RademacherAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-7430
Fang-Shu OuDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Andrew B DodgeAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Tyler J ZemlaAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Electra D PaskettCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
George J ChangDepartments of Surgical Oncology and Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Federico InnocentiEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Charles BlankeSouthwest Oncology Group Chair's Office and Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Heinz-Josef LenzDepartment of Preventative Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
Blasé N PoliteUniversity of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-8743-8096
Alan P VenookHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Mayo Clinic · USEast Carolina University · USSWOG Cancer Research Network · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
THE ALLIANCE NCTN BIOREPOSITORY AND BIOSPECIMEN RESOURCEU24CA196171 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Mine Cicek, Wendy Frankel · 2015 to 2026
$35.0M
SPORE Leukemia Tissue BankP50CA140158 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOMFIELD, CLARA D · 2009 to 2013
$11.2M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
OSU as a Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCI NCTNUG1CA233331 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI John L. Hays, Dwight H. Owen · 2019 to 2026
$8.9M
NCI, National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAPS) UG1 (funded extension)UG1CA232760 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Judy Caroline Boughey, Aaron Scott Mansfield · 2019 to 2026
$8.5M
ITSC for Leukemia: Novel Molecular strategies for NCTN "Individualized" TherapiesUG1CA233338 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI BYRD, JOHN C. · 2019 to 2025
$4.5M
Bristol-Myers SquibbGenentechMyriadNCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140158NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180861NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS U10CA180888NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196171NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA180830NCI NIH HHS UG1CA180830NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823NCI NIH HHS UG1CA189823NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA232760NCI NIH HHS UG1CA232760NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233327NCI NIH HHS UG1CA233327NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329NCI NIH HHS UG1CA233329NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233331NCI NIH HHS UG1CA233331NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233338NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233373NCI NIH HHS UG1CA233373PfizerSanofi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate the association between self-identified race and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy among patients enrolled in the randomized Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial.

methodsPatients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were identified by race. On the basis of covariates (treatment arm, KRAS status, sex, age, and body mass index), each Black patient was exact matched with a White patient. The association between race and OS and PFS was examined using a marginal Cox proportional hazard model for matched pairs. The interaction between KRAS status and race was tested in the model. The association between race and response to therapy and adverse events were examined using a marginal logistic regression model.

resultsIn total, 392 patients were matched and included in the final data set. No difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.16), PFS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78-1.20), or response to therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.52) was observed between Black and White patients. Patients with KRAS mutant status (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.67), a performance statusscore of 1 (reference, a performance status of 0; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88), or ≥3 metastatic sites (reference, 1 metastatic site; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.22-2.28) experienced worse OS. Black patients experienced lower rates and risk of grade ≥3 fatigue (6.6% vs 13.3%; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91) but were equally likely to be treated with a dose reduction (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.65).

conclusionsNo difference in OS, PFS, or response to therapy was observed between Black patients and White patients in an equal treatment setting of the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized controlled trial. LAY SUMMARY: Despite improvements in screening and treatment, studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in Black patients with colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in cancer-specific outcomes among Black and White patients receiving equivalent treatment on the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized clinical trial. In this study, there was no difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, or response to therapy between Black and White patients treated on a clinical trial. These findings suggest that access to care and differences in treatment may be responsible for racial disparities in colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsHealth Status DisparitiesHumansProportional Hazards ModelsRace Factorsclinical trialcolorectal neoplasmscontinental population groupshealth care disparities

Identifiers

PMID34374082
PMCPMC8478698
OpenAlexW3192945790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.