Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373949›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2021

Theoretical research on cage-like furazan-based energetic compounds and its derivatives.

Yan Huang, Le-Wu Zhan, Qian Zhang, Jing Hou, Bin-Dong Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan Huang *School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Le-Wu Zhan *School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Qian ZhangSchool of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Jing HouSchool of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China. chmhouj@njust.edu.cn.
Bin-Dong LiSchool of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China. libindong@njust.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3771-7649

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (CN) No. 30919011217National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) no. 21875109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this manuscript, we reported the design and prediction of two furazan-based cage-like molecules and their derivatives using density function theory (DFT). The heat formation and detonation properties were calculated using Hess's law and Kamlet-Jacobs equations with the B3PW91 method. The molecular stability and geometry were analyzed using the M06-2X method, and molecular crystal structures were predicted based on Monte Carlo simulation, while chemical reactive sites were judged using the PBE0 method based on Fukui function. The theoretical calculation result proved that the designed molecules exhibit ideal symmetric cage-like geometry and show superior physicochemical and detonation properties. Compared with traditional energetic materials, the designed molecules display more positive solid heat formation and lower sensitivity. The designed molecules could be considered promising high energy density material candidates with potential synthesis and application value. Two designed molecules display superior detonation performance and ideal completely symmetric cage-like geometry, which were proved theoretically as a promising HEDM candidate. A series of derivatives also exhibited excellent crystal density and physicochemical properties, while with more stable structure.

Indexed as

Cage-like moleculeDFTFurazanHEDMs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.