Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373940›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Accuracy of genomic breeding values and predictive ability for postweaning liveweight and age at first calving in a Nellore cattle population with missing sire information.

Rafael Lara Tonussi, Marisol Londoño-Gil, Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva, Ana Fabrícia Braga Magalhães, Sabrina Thaise Amorim, Sabrina Kluska, Rafael Espigolan, Elisa Peripolli, Angelica Simone Cravo Pereira, Raysildo Barbosa Lôbo and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rafael Lara TonussiGrupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP 14884-900, Brazil.
Marisol Londoño-GilGrupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP 14884-900, Brazil. londono.gil@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6522-5567
Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira SilvaZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Ana Fabrícia Braga MagalhãesGrupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP 14884-900, Brazil.
Sabrina Thaise AmorimGrupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4130-2040
Sabrina KluskaGrupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-9065
Rafael EspigolanGrupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-1643
Elisa PeripolliGrupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0962-6603
Angelica Simone Cravo PereiraFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária E Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, CEP 13635-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-0792
Raysildo Barbosa LôboAssociação Nacional de Criadores E Pesquisadores (ANCP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, CEP 14020-230, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6016-5817
Ignácio AguilarInstituto Nacional de Pesquisa Agropecuária (INIA), CEP 90200, Las Brujas, Uruguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-4752
Daniela Andressa Lino LourençoUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3140-1002
Fernando BaldiGrupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, SP, CEP 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4094-2011

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/25910-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multiple sire system (MSS) is a common mating scheme in extensive beef production systems. However, MSS does not allow paternity identification and lead to inaccurate genetic predictions. The objective of this study was to investigate the implementation of single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in different scenarios of uncertain paternity in the evaluation for 450-day adjusted liveweight (W450) and age at first calving (AFC) in a Nellore cattle population. To estimate the variance components using BLUP and ssGBLUP, the relationship matrix (A) with different proportions of animals with missing sires (MS) (scenarios 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of MS) was created. The genotyped animals with MS were randomly chosen, and ten replicates were performed for each scenario and trait. Five groups of animals were evaluated in each scenario: PHE, all animals with phenotypic records in the population; SIR, proven sires; GEN, genotyped animals; YNG, young animals without phenotypes and progeny; and YNGEN, young genotyped animals. The additive genetic variance decreased for both traits as the proportion of MS increased in the population when using the regular REML. When using the ssGBLUP, accuracies ranged from 0.13 to 0.47 for W450 and from 0.10 to 0.25 for AFC. For both traits, the prediction ability of the direct genomic value (DGV) decreased as the percentage of MS increased. These results emphasize that indirect prediction via DGV of young animals is more accurate when the SNP effects are derived from ssGBLUP with a reference population with known sires. The ssGBLUP could be applied in situations of uncertain paternity, especially when selecting young animals. This methodology is shown to be accurate, mainly in scenarios with a high percentage of MS.

Indexed as

GenomeModels, GeneticAnimalsCattleGenomicsGenotypePedigreePhenotypeAge at first calvingBeef cattleGenomic evaluationUncertain paternityWeight

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.