Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373858›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2021

Zhe Sang, Yufei Xiang, Ivet Bahar, Yi Shi

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhe SangDepartment of Cell Biology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yufei XiangDepartment of Cell Biology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ivet BaharDepartment Computational and Systems Biology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yi ShiDepartment of Cell Biology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
Mapping the Dynamic Interactome of Ig-fold Membrane Proteins Using Nanobody-Based ToolsR35GM137905 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Yi Shi · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM137905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobodies (Nbs) have recently emerged as a promising class of antibody fragments for biomedical and therapeutic applications. Despite having marked physicochemical properties, Nbs are derived from camelids and may require "humanization" to improve translational potentials for clinical trials. Here we have systematically analyzed the sequence and structural properties of Nbs based on NGS (next-generation sequencing) databases and high-resolution structures. Our analysis reveals substantial framework diversities and underscores the key differences between Nbs and human Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. We identified conserved residues that may contribute to enhanced solubility, structural stability, and antigen-binding, providing insights into Nb humanization. Based on big data analysis, we developed " AUTHOR SUMMARY: Camelid Nbs are characterized by small size, excellent pharmacological properties and high flexibility in bioengineering for therapeutic development. However, Nbs are "xeno" antibodies, which require "humanization" to improve their translational potential. Currently, there is a lack of systematic investigation of Nbs to rationally guide humanization. No dedicated software has been developed for this purpose. Here, we report the development of

Identifiers

PMID34373858
PMCPMC8351782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.