Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373832›Full record

ArticleVisceral medicine2021

The Psychosocial Burden on Liver Transplant Recipients during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Sabine Weber, Stephanie Rek, Daniela Eser-Valeri, Frank Padberg, Florian P Reiter, Enrico De Toni, Simon Hohenester, Sebastian Zimny, Markus Rehm, Markus Otto Guba and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visceral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality of Measurement Properties in Patient Reported Outcomes Used in Adult Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients: a Systematic Review.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sabine WeberDepartment of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie RekDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Daniela Eser-ValeriDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Frank PadbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Florian P ReiterDepartment of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Enrico De ToniDepartment of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Simon HohenesterDepartment of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian ZimnyDepartment of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Markus RehmDepartment of Anesthesiology, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Markus Otto GubaDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Alexander L GerbesDepartment of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Gerald DenkDepartment of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDue to the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, multiple measures have been implemented including social distancing and curfews. Both the disease and measures might cause stress, particularly in persons at risk, such as liver transplant (LT) recipients. Here, we evaluated the impact on psychosocial well-being of LT recipients.

methodsSeventy-nine LT recipients and 83 nontransplanted controls participated in this study. Questionnaires comprising the WHO-five well-being index (WHO-5), the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, and the preliminary COVID-19 Pandemic Mental Health Questionnaire (CoPaQ) were distributed among them. For the WHO-5 and UCLA Loneliness Scale, means of sum scores were compared between both groups, while a comparison on item level was conducted for the CoPaQ.

resultsThe general well-being was similar in LT recipients and controls (WHO-5: 64.0 ± 20.5% vs. 66.4 ± 17.3%), while the UCLA Loneliness Scale indicated a higher level of perceived social isolation (1.90 ± 0.51 vs. 1.65 ± 0.53,

conclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, LT recipients displayed a higher risk perception, a more pronounced risk-avoiding behavior and a higher perception of loneliness, while the overall well-being was comparable to nontransplanted controls.

Indexed as

Coronavirus disease 2019Liver transplantationMental healthQuality of lifeSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34373832
PMCPMC8339032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.