Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373530›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Validating deep learning inference during chest X-ray classification for COVID-19 screening.

Robbie Sadre, Baskaran Sundaram, Sharmila Majumdar, Daniela Ushizima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Audio texture analysis of COVID-19 cough, breath, and speech sounds.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robbie SadreComputational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Baskaran SundaramDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Sharmila MajumdarInstitute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA.
Daniela UshizimaComputational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. dushizima@lbl.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-9468

Funding

DOE | LDRD | Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) 107258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new coronavirus unleashed a worldwide pandemic in early 2020, and a fatality rate several times that of the flu. As the number of infections soared, and capabilities for testing lagged behind, chest X-ray (CXR) imaging became more relevant in the early diagnosis and treatment planning for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. In a few weeks, proposed new methods for lung screening using deep learning rapidly appeared, while quality assurance discussions lagged behind. This paper proposes a set of protocols to validate deep learning algorithms, including our ROI Hide-and-Seek protocol, which emphasizes or hides key regions of interest from CXR data. Our protocol allows assessing the classification performance for anomaly detection and its correlation to radiological signatures, an important issue overlooked in several deep learning approaches proposed so far. By running a set of systematic tests over CXR representations using public image datasets, we demonstrate the weaknesses of current techniques and offer perspectives on the advantages and limitations of automated radiography analysis when using heterogeneous data sources.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningCOVID-19HumansLungNeural Networks, ComputerPandemicsRadiography, ThoracicReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID34373530
PMCPMC8352989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.