Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Quantitative analysis of speckle-based X-ray dark-field imaging using numerical wave-optics simulations.

Sebastian Meyer, Serena Z Shi, Nadav Shapira, Andrew D A Maidment, Peter B Noël

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Laboratory-based x-ray dark-field microscopy.Physical review applied · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian MeyerDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA. sebastian.meyer@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Serena Z ShiDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA.
Nadav ShapiraDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA.
Andrew D A MaidmentDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA.
Peter B NoëlDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA. peter.noel@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
Training Program in Biomedical Imaging and Information SciencesT32EB009384 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEE, JAMES C, IVES, ZACHARY · 2009 to 2023
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dark-field signal measures the small-angle scattering strength and provides complementary diagnostic information. This is of particular interest for lung imaging due to the pronounced small-angle scatter from the alveolar microstructure. However, most dark-field imaging techniques are relatively complex, dose-inefficient, and require sophisticated optics and highly coherent X-ray sources. Speckle-based imaging promises to overcome these limitations due to its simple and versatile setup, only requiring the addition of a random phase modulator to conventional X-ray equipment. We investigated quantitatively the influence of sample structure, setup geometry, and source energy on the dark-field signal in speckle-based X-ray imaging with wave-optics simulations for ensembles of micro-spheres. We show that the dark-field signal is accurately predicted via a model originally derived for grating interferometry when using the mean frequency of the speckle pattern power spectral density as the characteristic speckle size. The size directly reflects the correlation length of the diffuser surface and did not change with energy or propagation distance within the near-field. The dark-field signal had a distinct dependence on sample structure and setup geometry but was also affected by beam hardening-induced modifications of the visibility spectrum. This study quantitatively demonstrates the behavior of the dark-field signal in speckle-based X-ray imaging.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnostic ImagingEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansInterferometryLungRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID34373478
PMCPMC8352882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.