Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373454›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

A common limiter circuit for opioid choice and relapse identified in a rodent addiction model.

Jasper A Heinsbroek, Giuseppe Giannotti, Mitchel R Mandel, Megan Josey, Gary Aston-Jones, Morgan H James, Jamie Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The importance of choice and agency in animal models of addiction.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Comparison of binge-eating disorder and food addiction.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasper A HeinsbroekDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4641-6899
Giuseppe GiannottiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0629-4882
Mitchel R MandelDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Megan JoseyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Gary Aston-JonesBrain Health Institute, Rutgers University and Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Morgan H JamesBrain Health Institute, Rutgers University and Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Jamie PetersDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. jamie.l.peters@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7573-6384

Funding

Dissecting Ventral Pallidal Subcircuit Contributions to Drug Seeking in AddictionDP5OD026407 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HEINSBROEK, JASPER · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Extinction Circuits Controlling Heroin SeekingR01DA045836 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PETERS, JAMIE · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Simulating Extinction Memory with Infralimbic DREADDsK01DA038235 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PETERS, JAMIE · 2014 to 2018
$871k
Orexin/hypocretin as a common mediator of stress and reward behavior in cocaine addictionR00DA045765 · NIDA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JAMES, MORGAN H. · 2021 to 2023
$747k
Infralimbic Ensembles and Extinction of Drug MemoriesR21DA044524 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PETERS, JAMIE · 2017 to 2018
$419k
Orexin/hypocretin as a common mediator of stress and reward behavior in cocaine addictionK99DA045765 · NIDA · RBHS-ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI JAMES, MORGAN H. · 2019 to 2020
$388k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA038235NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA045765NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA045765NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045836NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA044524NIH HHS DP5 OD026407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activity in numerous brain regions drives heroin seeking, but no circuits that limit heroin seeking have been identified. Furthermore, the neural circuits controlling opioid choice are unknown. In this study, we examined the role of the infralimbic cortex (IL) to nucleus accumbens shell (NAshell) pathway during heroin choice and relapse. This model yielded subpopulations of heroin versus food preferring rats during choice, and choice was unrelated to subsequent relapse rates to heroin versus food cues, suggesting that choice and relapse are distinct behavioral constructs. Supporting this, inactivation of the IL with muscimol produced differential effects on opioid choice versus relapse. A pathway-specific chemogenetic approach revealed, however, that the IL-NAshell pathway acts as a common limiter of opioid choice and relapse. Furthermore, dendritic spines in IL-NAshell neurons encode distinct aspects of heroin versus food reinforcement. Thus, opioid choice and relapse share a common addiction-limiting circuit in the IL-NAshell pathway.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainCerebral CortexCuesDecision MakingDrug-Seeking BehaviorEatingExtinction, PsychologicalFoodHeroinHeroin DependenceMaleAnalgesics, OpioidHeroin

Identifiers

PMID34373454
PMCPMC8352904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.