ArticleJournal of microbiology and biotechnology2021
Suppression of Fusarium Wilt Caused by
Article in Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antagonistic Activity and Molecular Insights into the Biocontrol of Korla Pear Fire Blight byBiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of the cell-free fermentation filtrate ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Paenibacillus peoriae: current knowledge and agricultural biotechnology potential of a close relative of P. polymyxa.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Review
- Lettuce fortification through vitamin BJournal of the science of food and agriculture · 2025Article
- Identification, Genome Characterization, and Growth Optimization ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Multi-omics analyses reveal the biocontrol potential of endophyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Identification and Surveys of Promoting Plant Growth VOCs from Biocontrol Bacteria Paenibacillus peoriae GXUN15128.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Comparative genomic and functional analyses ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was carried out to explore a non-chemical strategy for enhancing productivity by employing some antagonistic rhizobacteria. One hundred eighteen bacterial isolates were obtained from the rhizospheric zone of various crop fields of Gangwon-do, Korea, and screened for antifungal activity against Fusarium wilt (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.