Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373251›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2022

Silicone oil versus gas tamponade for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated successfully with a propensity score analysis: Japan Retinal Detachment Registry.

Ryoh Funatsu, Hiroto Terasaki, Chihaya Koriyama, Toshifumi Yamashita, Hideki Shiihara, Taiji Sakamoto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Silicone oil vs. gas tamponade in giant retinal tear associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Silicone oil tamponade in vitreoretinal surgery and future perspective: a narrative review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Retinal detachment.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryoh FunatsuOphhtalmology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Hiroto TerasakiOphhtalmology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Chihaya KoriyamaEpidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Toshifumi YamashitaOphhtalmology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Hideki ShiiharaOphhtalmology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Taiji SakamotoOphhtalmology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan tsakamot@m3.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-0287-3801
Kagoshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsTo compare the effects of silicone oil tamponade (SOT) to that of gas tamponade (GT) on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after successful vitrectomy for retinal detachment (RD).

methodsA retrospective, multicentre, nationwide study with RD who were registered in the Japan-RD Registry. All cases with RD treated with successful vitrectomy between February 2016 and March 2017 were studied. A propensity score matching was performed using the preoperative findings as covariates to adjust the relevant confounders. The primary outcome was the estimated mean difference of the postoperative BCVA in 6 months between eyes treated with SOT to those treated with GT.

resultsOf the 3446 cases registered, 2097 cases met the entry criteria. There were 2042 eyes that had GT and 55 eyes that had SOT. Primary success was defined as a reattached retina with no tamponade at 6 months. After propensity score matching, each group contained 40 cases. The preoperative BCVA was 0.966±0.738 logMAR units in the GT group and 1.270±0.945 logMAR units in the SOT group (p=0.177). Six months postoperatively, the BCVA in the GT group was significantly better at 0.309 logMAR units in the GT group than the 0.671 logMAR units in the SOT group (p=0.002).

conclusionsEven after successful surgery for RD, eyes that experienced SOT had poorer BCVA than eyes treated with GOT. SOT should be considered cautiously. PRECIS: Propensity score analysis of eyes with rhegmatogenous RD showed that postoperative vision was worse in eyes treated once with silicone oil than with gas even after completely successful surgery.

Indexed as

Retinal DetachmentSilicone OilsHumansJapanPropensity ScoreRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityVitrectomySilicone Oilsretinatreatment surgeryvitreous

Identifiers

PMID34373251
PMCPMC9340049
OpenAlexW3192521756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.