Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34373212›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2021

Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI).

Carolyn A Salter, Philip Vu Bach, Lawrence Jenkins, Nelson Bennett, Faysal A Yafi, Farouk El Khatib, Elizabeth Schofield, Nicole Benfante, Stanley E Althof, Christian J Nelson and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The future of penile implants IJIR special edition: 50International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Under-recognized factors affecting penile implant satisfaction in patients.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carolyn A SalterDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Philip Vu BachDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lawrence JenkinsDepartment of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nelson BennettDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Faysal A YafiDepartment of Urology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Farouk El KhatibDepartment of Urology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Elizabeth SchofieldDepartment of Psychiatry/Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nicole BenfanteDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Stanley E AlthofDepartment of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Christian J NelsonDepartment of Psychiatry/Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
John P MulhallDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: mulhalj1@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo validated English language patient-reported outcome (PRO) currently exists that assesses satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Satisfaction data have been largely based primarily on surgeon assessment of patients or using questionnaires that have not been designed for this purpose.

aimTo develop an English-language validated PRO that assesses patient satisfaction after IPP surgery.

methodsInitially, a literature review and discussions with experts defined domains important to IPP satisfaction (pain, appearance, function, overall satisfaction). The initial 35-item Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) was developed. Cognitive interviews were then performed with IPP patients (n = 12) to gain feedback on the SSIPI domains and items. These data were used to modify SSIPI with the addition of 2 questions for a final item number of 37. Patients from 4 centers, who were between 6 months and 5 years after IPP, were administered the questionnaire through RedCap. Reliability statistics and content analysis were used to winnow questions to yield the final 16-item version of the SSIPI. Internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation. Test-retest reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients using baseline and 2-week data. For convergent validity, the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire were used. For discriminant validity, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of the SSIPI. OUTCOMES: Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and confirmatory factor analysis were assessed.

results118 men were surveyed. Mean age was 66.8 ± 9.5 years. The 16-item SSIPI showed high internal consistency with an overall Cronbach's Alpha of 0.97 (domains 0.85-0.89). Item-total correlations for individual items to subscales ranged from 0.60 to 0.91. The overall test-retest reliability was 0.94 (domains 0.87-0.93). Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and Self-Esteem and Relationship had correlations of 0.84 overall (domains 0.57-0.79) and 0.47 overall (domains 0.34-0.44), respectively. International Prostate Symptom Score (discriminant validity) had correlations of -0.29 overall (domains -0.17 to -0.31). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SSIPI is the first English-language validated IPP satisfaction PRO. This will enable clinicians to collect satisfaction data in a standardized way. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: As strengths we have used a rigorous psychometric process and have no industry sponsorship. Limitations include small numbers of specific subpopulations.

conclusionThe SSIPI has demonstrated robust psychometric properties. Salter CA, Bach PV, Jenkins L, et al. Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI). J Sex Med 2021;18:1641-1651.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPatient SatisfactionPenile ProsthesisAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesErectile DysfunctionPatient-Reported OutcomesPenile ImplantQuestionnaireSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID34373212
PMCPMC9472697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.