ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2021
Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI).
Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The management of non-infectious complications of penile implant surgery-a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Quality of life outcomes following penile prosthesis insertion in the post-ischaemic priapism setting.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Arabic translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the satisfaction survey for inflatable penile implant: The SSIPI-AR.Arab journal of urology · 2026Article
- Preliminary psychometric linguistic validation of the satisfaction survey for inflatable penile implant in Spanish.Sexual medicine · 2025Article
- Commentary on: Long-term experience with AMS-700 CXR inflatable penile prosthesis in high-risk patients with corporal fibrosis.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Initial linguistic and cultural validation of the satisfaction survey for inflatable penile implant (SSIPI) in Spanish.Actas urologicas espanolas · 2025Article
- Comment on: Penile prosthesis implantation is safe and effective in Peyronie's Disease patients with and without erectile dysfunction.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Long-term experience with AMS-700 CXR inflatable penile prosthesis in high-risk patients with corporal fibrosis.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Assessing psychiatric risk with a focus on optimizing patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis placement-a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- The future of penile implants IJIR special edition: 50International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after penile prosthesis placement in men with and without Peyronie's disease.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- A pilot study of inflatable penile prosthesis placement in transgender neophallus using TutoplastTranslational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Prostate cancer treatment modality among factors influencing penile prosthesis satisfaction.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Comparison of satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation in patients with prostate cancer radiation therapy versus radical prostatectomy.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Surgeon variations in the perioperative evaluation of penile prosthesis patients.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Under-recognized factors affecting penile implant satisfaction in patients.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Inflatable Penile Prostheses for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Evidence to Date.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNo validated English language patient-reported outcome (PRO) currently exists that assesses satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Satisfaction data have been largely based primarily on surgeon assessment of patients or using questionnaires that have not been designed for this purpose.
aimTo develop an English-language validated PRO that assesses patient satisfaction after IPP surgery.
methodsInitially, a literature review and discussions with experts defined domains important to IPP satisfaction (pain, appearance, function, overall satisfaction). The initial 35-item Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) was developed. Cognitive interviews were then performed with IPP patients (n = 12) to gain feedback on the SSIPI domains and items. These data were used to modify SSIPI with the addition of 2 questions for a final item number of 37. Patients from 4 centers, who were between 6 months and 5 years after IPP, were administered the questionnaire through RedCap. Reliability statistics and content analysis were used to winnow questions to yield the final 16-item version of the SSIPI. Internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation. Test-retest reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients using baseline and 2-week data. For convergent validity, the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire were used. For discriminant validity, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of the SSIPI. OUTCOMES: Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and confirmatory factor analysis were assessed.
results118 men were surveyed. Mean age was 66.8 ± 9.5 years. The 16-item SSIPI showed high internal consistency with an overall Cronbach's Alpha of 0.97 (domains 0.85-0.89). Item-total correlations for individual items to subscales ranged from 0.60 to 0.91. The overall test-retest reliability was 0.94 (domains 0.87-0.93). Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and Self-Esteem and Relationship had correlations of 0.84 overall (domains 0.57-0.79) and 0.47 overall (domains 0.34-0.44), respectively. International Prostate Symptom Score (discriminant validity) had correlations of -0.29 overall (domains -0.17 to -0.31). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SSIPI is the first English-language validated IPP satisfaction PRO. This will enable clinicians to collect satisfaction data in a standardized way. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: As strengths we have used a rigorous psychometric process and have no industry sponsorship. Limitations include small numbers of specific subpopulations.
conclusionThe SSIPI has demonstrated robust psychometric properties. Salter CA, Bach PV, Jenkins L, et al. Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI). J Sex Med 2021;18:1641-1651.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.