Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34372940›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2021

QPHAR: quantitative pharmacophore activity relationship: method and validation.

Stefan M Kohlbacher, Thierry Langer, Thomas Seidel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ligand-Based Compound Activity Prediction via Few-Shot Learning.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan M KohlbacherDivision of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Thierry LangerDivision of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas SeidelDivision of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria. thomas.seidel@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9815-6577

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 821528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

QSAR methods are widely applied in the drug discovery process, both in the hit-to-lead and lead optimization phase, as well as in the drug-approval process. Most QSAR algorithms are limited to using molecules as input and disregard pharmacophores or pharmacophoric features entirely. However, due to the high level of abstraction, pharmacophore representations provide some advantageous properties for building quantitative SAR models. The abstract depiction of molecular interactions avoids a bias towards overrepresented functional groups in small datasets. Furthermore, a well-crafted quantitative pharmacophore model can generalise to underrepresented or even missing molecular features in the training set by using pharmacophoric interaction patterns only. This paper presents a novel method to construct quantitative pharmacophore models and demonstrates its applicability and robustness on more than 250 diverse datasets. fivefold cross-validation on these datasets with default settings yielded an average RMSE of 0.62, with an average standard deviation of 0.18. Additional cross-validation studies on datasets with 15-20 training samples showed that robust quantitative pharmacophore models could be obtained. These low requirements for dataset sizes render quantitative pharmacophores a viable go-tomethod for medicinal chemists, especially in the lead-optimisation stage of drug discovery projects.

Indexed as

Machine learningPharmacophoreQSARQuantitative-pharmacophore-modelRegression

Identifiers

PMID34372940
PMCPMC8351372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.