Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34372920›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2021

A novel machine learning-based approach for the computational functional assessment of pharmacogenomic variants.

Maria-Theodora Pandi, Maria Koromina, Iordanis Tsafaridis, Sotirios Patsilinakos, Evangelos Christoforou, Peter J van der Spek, George P Patrinos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Overcoming Barriers to Discovery and Implementation of Equitable Pharmacogenomic Testing in Oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Maria-Theodora Pandi *Erasmus University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Bioinformatics Unit, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Maria Koromina *Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Iordanis TsafaridisKatharsis Technologies Inc., Chicago, USA.
Sotirios PatsilinakosKonstantopouleion General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Evangelos ChristoforouKatharsis Technologies Inc., Chicago, USA.
Peter J van der SpekErasmus University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Bioinformatics Unit, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
George P PatrinosLaboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece. gpatrinos@upatras.gr.ORCID 0000-0002-0519-7776
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Patras · GRAgia Olga Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe field of pharmacogenomics focuses on the way a person's genome affects his or her response to a certain dose of a specified medication. The main aim is to utilize this information to guide and personalize the treatment in a way that maximizes the clinical benefits and minimizes the risks for the patients, thus fulfilling the promises of personalized medicine. Technological advances in genome sequencing, combined with the development of improved computational methods for the efficient analysis of the huge amount of generated data, have allowed the fast and inexpensive sequencing of a patient's genome, hence rendering its incorporation into clinical routine practice a realistic possibility.

methodsThis study exploited thoroughly characterized in functional level SNVs within genes involved in drug metabolism and transport, to train a classifier that would categorize novel variants according to their expected effect on protein functionality. This categorization is based on the available in silico prediction and/or conservation scores, which are selected with the use of recursive feature elimination process. Toward this end, information regarding 190 pharmacovariants was leveraged, alongside with 4 machine learning algorithms, namely AdaBoost, XGBoost, multinomial logistic regression, and random forest, of which the performance was assessed through 5-fold cross validation.

resultsAll models achieved similar performance toward making informed conclusions, with RF model achieving the highest accuracy (85%, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.90), as well as improved overall performance (precision 85%, sensitivity 84%, specificity 94%) and being used for subsequent analyses. When applied on real world WGS data, the selected RF model identified 2 missense variants, expected to lead to decreased function proteins and 1 to increased. As expected, a greater number of variants were highlighted when the approach was used on NGS data derived from targeted resequencing of coding regions. Specifically, 71 variants (out of 156 with sufficient annotation information) were classified as to "Decreased function," 41 variants as "No" function proteins, and 1 variant in "Increased function."

conclusionOverall, the proposed RF-based classification model holds promise to lead to an extremely useful variant prioritization and act as a scoring tool with interesting clinical applications in the fields of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyPharmacogeneticsAlgorithmsGenomicsHumansInactivation, MetabolicLogistic ModelsMachine LearningPharmacogenomic VariantsPrecision MedicineWhole Genome SequencingComputational approachesFunctional predictionMachine learningPharmacogenomic variants

Identifiers

PMID34372920
PMCPMC8351412
OpenAlexW3157710893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.