Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34372811›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Perceived helpfulness of treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: a World Mental Health Surveys report.

Dan J Stein, Alan E Kazdin, Ayelet Meron Ruscio, Wai Tat Chiu, Nancy A Sampson, Hannah N Ziobrowski, Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, Ali Al-Hamzawi, Jordi Alonso, Yasmin Altwaijri and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. How Do You TreatMedical acupuncture · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 20 institutions in 23 countries.

Dan J SteinDepartment of Psychiatry & Mental Health and South African Medical Council Research Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. dan.stein@uct.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0001-7218-7810
Alan E KazdinDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ayelet Meron RuscioDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wai Tat ChiuDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy A SampsonDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hannah N ZiobrowskiDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sergio Aguilar-GaxiolaCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, UC Davis Health System, Sacramento, California, USA.
Ali Al-HamzawiCollege of Medicine, Al-Qadisiya University, Diwaniya governorate, Al Diwaniyah, Iraq.
Jordi AlonsoHealth Services Research Unit, IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Yasmin AltwaijriEpidemiology Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ronny BruffaertsUniversitair Psychiatrisch Centrum - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (UPC-KUL), Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Brendan BuntingSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK.
Giovanni de GirolamoIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Peter de JongeDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Louisa DegenhardtNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Oye GurejeDepartment of Psychiatry, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Josep Maria HaroParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Universitat de Barcelona, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Meredith G HarrisSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Aimee KaramInstitute for Development, Research, Advocacy & Applied Care (IDRAAC), Beirut, Lebanon.
Elie G KaramInstitute for Development, Research, Advocacy & Applied Care (IDRAAC), Beirut, Lebanon.
Viviane Kovess-MasfetyEcole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique (EHESP), EA 4057, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Sing LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong.
Maria Elena Medina-MoraNational Institute of Psychiatry-Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jacek MoskalewiczInstitute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Fernando Navarro-MateuUDIF-SM, Servicio Murciano de Salud; IMIB-Arrixaca; CIBERESP-Murcia, Región de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Daisuke NishiDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
José Posada-VillaColegio Mayor de Cundinamarca University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bogota, Colombia.
Kate M ScottDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.
Maria Carmen VianaDepartment of Social Medicine, Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil.
Daniel V VigoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Miguel XavierLisbon Institute of Global Mental Health and Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Zahari ZarkovDepartment of Mental Health, National Center of Public Health and Analyses, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Ronald C KesslerDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
WHO World Mental Health Survey collaborators
Harvard University · USÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FRInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz · MXSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAThe University of Queensland · AUUniversidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca · COUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan · NGUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Al-Qadisiyah · IQUniversity of Ulster · GBUNSW Sydney · AUBoston University · USCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITChinese University of Hong Kong · HKInstitute for Development, Research, Advocacy and Applied Care · LBInstitute of Psychiatry and Neurology · PLInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ESKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKU Leuven · BE

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY-- NATIONAL COMORBIDITY SURVEY REPLICATIONU01MH060220 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI KESSLER, RONALD C · 1999 to 2010
$18.7M
Lebanon-Epidemiology: The NCS Replication StudyR03TW006481 · FIC · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI KESSLER, RONALD C · 2004 to 2006
$142k
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW006481NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH060220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment guidelines for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are based on a relatively small number of randomized controlled trials and do not consider patient-centered perceptions of treatment helpfulness. We investigated the prevalence and predictors of patient-reported treatment helpfulness for DSM-5 GAD and its two main treatment pathways: encounter-level treatment helpfulness and persistence in help-seeking after prior unhelpful treatment.

methodsData came from community epidemiologic surveys in 23 countries in the WHO World Mental Health surveys. DSM-5 GAD was assessed with the fully structured WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0. Respondents with a history of GAD were asked whether they ever received treatment and, if so, whether they ever considered this treatment helpful. Number of professionals seen before obtaining helpful treatment was also assessed. Parallel survival models estimated probability and predictors of a given treatment being perceived as helpful and of persisting in help-seeking after prior unhelpful treatment.

resultsThe overall prevalence rate of GAD was 4.5%, with lower prevalence in low/middle-income countries (2.8%) than high-income countries (5.3%); 34.6% of respondents with lifetime GAD reported ever obtaining treatment for their GAD, with lower proportions in low/middle-income countries (19.2%) than high-income countries (38.4%); 3) 70% of those who received treatment perceived the treatment to be helpful, with prevalence comparable in low/middle-income countries and high-income countries. Survival analysis suggested that virtually all patients would have obtained helpful treatment if they had persisted in help-seeking with up to 10 professionals. However, we estimated that only 29.7% of patients would have persisted that long. Obtaining helpful treatment at the person-level was associated with treatment type, comorbid panic/agoraphobia, and childhood adversities, but most of these predictors were important because they predicted persistence rather than encounter-level treatment helpfulness.

conclusionsThe majority of individuals with GAD do not receive treatment. Most of those who receive treatment regard it as helpful, but receiving helpful treatment typically requires persistence in help-seeking. Future research should focus on ensuring that helpfulness is included as part of the evaluation. Clinicians need to emphasize the importance of persistence to patients beginning treatment.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersComorbidityDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHealth SurveysHumansPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesGeneralized anxiety disorderPathways to treatmentPatient-centered outcomesTreatment helpfulness

Identifiers

PMID34372811
PMCPMC8351147
OpenAlexW3192059233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.