ArticleBMC cancer2021
Using a machine learning approach to identify key prognostic molecules for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.Alpha psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Fivefold Cross-Validation Approach in Evaluating the Robustness of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Esophageal Cancer.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026Article
- Building an interpretable machine learning prognosis prediction model-based on baseline examinations of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Advancements and challenges in esophageal carcinoma prognostic models: A comprehensive review and future directions.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrated machine learning developed a prognosis-related gene signature to predict prognosis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence enhances the management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the precision oncology era.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Review
- Deep learning in cancer genomics and histopathology.Genome medicine · 2024Review
- Laboratory blood parameters and machine learning for the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence: clinical applications and future advancement in gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Individualized treatment decision model for inoperable elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on multi-modal data fusion.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Micro-inflammation related gene signatures are associated with clinical features and immune status of fibromyalgia.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Machine learning‑based prediction of survival prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Biomarkers for Early Detection, Prognosis, and Therapeutics of Esophageal Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Identification of m6a-related signature genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by machine learning method.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Construction of genetic classification model for coronary atherosclerosis heart disease using three machine learning methods.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- A computational method for large-scale identification of esophageal cancer-related genes.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Digestive Endoscope Based on Artificial Intelligence System in Diagnosing Early Esophageal Carcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Identification of Diagnostic Biomarkers in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Bioinformatics Analysis and Machine Learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA plethora of prognostic biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that have hitherto been reported are challenged with low reproducibility due to high molecular heterogeneity of ESCC. The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal biomarkers for ESCC using machine learning algorithms.
methodsBiomarkers related to clinical survival, recurrence or therapeutic response of patients with ESCC were determined through literature database searching. Forty-eight biomarkers linked to recurrence or prognosis of ESCC were used to construct a molecular interaction network based on NetBox and then to identify the functional modules. Publicably available mRNA transcriptome data of ESCC downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets included GSE53625 and TCGA-ESCC. Five machine learning algorithms, including logical regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF) and XGBoost, were used to develop classifiers for prognostic classification for feature selection. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of the prognostic classifiers. The importances of identified molecules were ranked by their occurrence frequencies in the prognostic classifiers. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival.
resultsA total of 48 clinically proven molecules associated with ESCC progression were used to construct a molecular interaction network with 3 functional modules comprising 17 component molecules. The 131,071 prognostic classifiers using these 17 molecules were built for each machine learning algorithm. Using the occurrence frequencies in the prognostic classifiers with AUCs greater than the mean value of all 131,071 AUCs to rank importances of these 17 molecules, stratifin encoded by SFN was identified as the optimal prognostic biomarker for ESCC, whose performance was further validated in another 2 independent cohorts.
conclusionThe occurrence frequencies across various feature selection approaches reflect the degree of clinical importance and stratifin is an optimal prognostic biomarker for ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.