Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34372769›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Clinical and virological outcomes with baloxavir compared with oseltamivir in pediatric patients aged 6 to < 12 years with influenza: an open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial protocol.

Nobuhisa Ishiguro, Ichiro Morioka, Takashi Nakano, Masashi Furukawa, Shintaro Tanaka, Masahiro Kinoshita, Atsushi Manabe

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antiviral Effect of Amentoflavone Against Influenza Viruses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Baloxavir Marboxil: An Original New Drug against Influenza.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nobuhisa IshiguroDivision of Infection Control, Hokkaido University Hospital, Nishi 5, Kita 14, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan. nisgr@mrj.biglobe.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8594-6345
Ichiro MoriokaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi NakanoDepartment of Pediatrics, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Masashi FurukawaBiostatistics Center, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Shintaro TanakaMedical Affairs, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro KinoshitaMedical Affairs, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi ManabeDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shionogi (Japan) · JPHokkaido University · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPNihon University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with influenza virus infections are prone to complications and are common sources of influenza transmission. Baloxavir marboxil inhibits cap-dependent endonuclease and was approved for influenza treatment in adolescent, adult, and pediatric patients in Japan. The miniSTONE-2 study included pediatric patients with influenza (1 to < 12 years) and demonstrated similar median times to alleviation of signs and symptoms of influenza with a single dose of baloxavir granules (weight < 20 kg: 2 mg/kg, ≥ 20 kg: 40 mg) and oseltamivir. Although the baloxavir dose in miniSTONE-2 was higher than the Japanese-approved dose, baloxavir exposure in miniSTONE-2 was similar to Japanese pediatric patients who receive the Japanese-approved dose. This study will be the first randomized active-controlled study in pediatric patients with influenza using the Japanese-approved dose of baloxavir.

methodsThis is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial in which 200 Japanese subjects aged 6 to < 12 years with influenza virus infection are randomly allocated (2:1) to a single dose of baloxavir at the approved dose in Japan (weight ≥ 10 to < 20 kg: 10 mg, ≥ 20 to  < 40 kg: 20 mg, ≥ 40 kg: 40 mg) or oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days. The primary clinical endpoint is the time to illness alleviation of influenza, from administration of baloxavir or oseltamivir until the following criteria were met and sustained for at least 21.5 h (24 h-10%): cough and nasal discharge/nasal congestion rated as absent or mild axillary body temperature < 37.5 °C. The primary analysis population is the intention-to-treat infected population, which includes all pediatric subjects who receive at least one dose of study drug and have confirmed influenza virus infection by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The safety population includes all subjects who receive at least one dose of study drug. DISCUSSION: No comparative studies have been conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of baloxavir versus a comparator in pediatric patients with influenza infection in Japan. The outcomes from this trial will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of baloxavir as an antiviral treatment option for Japanese pediatric patients with influenza infection. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs011200011. Registered November 2020. ( https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/ ).

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsDibenzothiepinsInfluenza, HumanOseltamivirAdolescentAdultChildHumansMorpholinesMulticenter Studies as TopicPyridonesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTriazinesAntiviral AgentsbaloxavirDibenzothiepinsMorpholinesOseltamivirPyridonesTriazinesBaloxavirChildClinical trial protocolInfluenzaJapaneseOseltamivir

Identifiers

PMID34372769
PMCPMC8350309
OpenAlexW3192413080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.