Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34372575›Full record

ReviewViruses2021

Cellular Uptake and Intracellular Phosphorylation of GS-441524: Implications for Its Effectiveness against COVID-19.

Henrik Berg Rasmussen, Gesche Jürgens, Ragnar Thomsen, Olivier Taboureau, Kornelius Zeth, Poul Erik Hansen, Peter Riis Hansen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Preclinical Pharmacokinetics andFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  12. Scoping insight on antiviral drugs against COVID-19.Arabian journal of chemistry · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrik Berg RasmussenInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Sct. Hans, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Gesche JürgensClinical Pharmacology Unit, Zealand University Hospital, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Ragnar ThomsenSection of Forensic Chemistry, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6502-3583
Olivier TaboureauINSERM U1133, CNRS UMR 8251, Université de Paris, F-75013 Paris, France.
Kornelius ZethDepartment of Science and Environment, Roskilde University Center, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Poul Erik HansenDepartment of Science and Environment, Roskilde University Center, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4751-9910
Peter Riis HansenDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-535X
Roskilde University · DKCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GS-441524 is an adenosine analog and the parent nucleoside of the prodrug remdesivir, which has received emergency approval for treatment of COVID-19. Recently, GS-441524 has been proposed to be effective in the treatment of COVID-19, perhaps even being superior to remdesivir for treatment of this disease. Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of GS-441524 requires understanding of its uptake and intracellular conversion to GS-441524 triphosphate, the active antiviral substance. We here discuss the potential impact of these pharmacokinetic steps of GS-441524 on the formation of its active antiviral substance and effectiveness for treatment of COVID-19. Available protein expression data suggest that several adenosine transporters are expressed at only low levels in the epithelial cells lining the alveoli in the lungs, i.e., the alveolar cells or pneumocytes from healthy lungs. This may limit uptake of GS-441524. Importantly, cellular uptake of GS-441524 may be reduced during hypoxia and inflammation due to decreased expression of adenosine transporters. Similarly, hypoxia and inflammation may lead to reduced expression of adenosine kinase, which is believed to convert GS-441524 to GS-441524 monophosphate, the perceived rate-limiting step in the intracellular formation of GS-441524 triphosphate. Moreover, increases in extracellular and intracellular levels of adenosine, which may occur during critical illnesses, has the potential to competitively decrease cellular uptake and phosphorylation of GS-441524. Taken together, tissue hypoxia and severe inflammation in COVID-19 may lead to reduced uptake and phosphorylation of GS-441524 with lowered therapeutic effectiveness as a potential outcome. Hypoxia may be particularly critical to the ability of GS-441524 to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 from tissues with low basal expression of adenosine transporters, such as alveolar cells. This knowledge may also be relevant to treatments with other antiviral adenosine analogs and anticancer adenosine analogs as well.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdenosineAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAnimalsAntiviral AgentsHumansPhosphorylationProdrugsSARS-CoV-2AdenosineAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsGS-441524Prodrugsremdesiviradenosine analogsadenosine kinaseadenosine levelsadenosine transportersCOVID-19GS-441524

Identifiers

PMID34372575
PMCPMC8310262
OpenAlexW3182668412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.