Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34372280›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Review on Mental Stress Assessment Methods Using EEG Signals.

Rateb Katmah, Fares Al-Shargie, Usman Tariq, Fabio Babiloni, Fadwa Al-Mughairbi, Hasan Al-Nashash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Different pattern: a new EEG-based method for mental performance detection.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rateb KatmahBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates.
Fares Al-ShargieDepartment of Electrical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-5792-8032
Usman TariqDepartment of Electrical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-8244-2165
Fabio BabiloniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Sapienza Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4962-176X
Fadwa Al-MughairbiCollege of Medicines and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Hasan Al-NashashDepartment of Electrical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

American University of Sharjah FRG20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental stress is one of the serious factors that lead to many health problems. Scientists and physicians have developed various tools to assess the level of mental stress in its early stages. Several neuroimaging tools have been proposed in the literature to assess mental stress in the workplace. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal is one important candidate because it contains rich information about mental states and condition. In this paper, we review the existing EEG signal analysis methods on the assessment of mental stress. The review highlights the critical differences between the research findings and argues that variations of the data analysis methods contribute to several contradictory results. The variations in results could be due to various factors including lack of standardized protocol, the brain region of interest, stressor type, experiment duration, proper EEG processing, feature extraction mechanism, and type of classifier. Therefore, the significant part related to mental stress recognition is choosing the most appropriate features. In particular, a complex and diverse range of EEG features, including time-varying, functional, and dynamic brain connections, requires integration of various methods to understand their associations with mental stress. Accordingly, the review suggests fusing the cortical activations with the connectivity network measures and deep learning approaches to improve the accuracy of mental stress level assessment.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyHumansStress, Psychologicalconnectivity networkdata analysisEEGmachine Learningmental stress

Identifiers

PMID34372280
PMCPMC8347831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.