ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
The Use of Wearable Sensor Technology to Detect Shock Impacts in Sports and Occupational Settings: A Scoping Review.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Force-Sensor-Based Analysis of the Effects of a Six-Week Plyometric Training Program on the Speed, Strength, and Balance Ability on Hard and Soft Surfaces of Adolescent Female Basketball Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wearable technology for athletes: material innovations, performance monitoring, and emerging paradigms.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- A Simple Model for Estimating the Kinematics of Tape-like Unstable Bases from Angular Measurements near Anchor Points.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A perspective on competitive freeride skiing and snowboarding.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- MultiSenseBadminton: Wearable Sensor-Based Biomechanical Dataset for Evaluation of Badminton Performance.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Dementia in former amateur and professional contact sports participants: population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- The Ecological Validity of Countermovement Jump to On-Court Asymmetry in Basketball.Sports medicine international open · 2022Article
- Digital Biomarker-Based Studies: Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Article
- A Focused Review on the Flexible Wearable Sensors for Sports: From Kinematics to Physiologies.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Human Movement Quality Assessment Using Sensor Technologies in Recreational and Professional Sports: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Reliability and Validity of Running Cadence and Stance Time Derived from Instrumented Wireless Earbuds.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Reliability of MEMS in Shock Environments: 2000-2020.Micromachines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Shock impacts during activity may cause damage to the joints, muscles, bones, or inner organs. To define thresholds for tolerable impacts, there is a need for methods that can accurately monitor shock impacts in real-life settings. Therefore, the main aim of this scoping review was to present an overview of existing methods for assessments of shock impacts using wearable sensor technology within two domains: sports and occupational settings. Online databases were used to identify papers published in 2010-2020, from which we selected 34 papers that used wearable sensor technology to measure shock impacts. No studies were found on occupational settings. For the sports domain, accelerometry was the dominant type of wearable sensor technology utilized, interpreting peak acceleration as a proxy for impact. Of the included studies, 28 assessed foot strike in running, head impacts in invasion and team sports, or different forms of jump landings or plyometric movements. The included studies revealed a lack of consensus regarding sensor placement and interpretation of the results. Furthermore, the identified high proportion of validation studies support previous concerns that wearable sensors at present are inadequate as a stand-alone method for valid and accurate data on shock impacts in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.