Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34371967›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Engaging with a Digital Intervention among Those with Food Insecurity, Binge Eating, and Obesity.

Anu Venkatesh, Angela Chang, Emilie A Green, Tianna Randall, Raquel Gallagher, Jennifer E Wildes, Andrea K Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anu VenkateshDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8682-2608
Angela ChangDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-5264
Emilie A GreenDepartment of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University for Medical Sciences, Chicago, IL 60064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6774-3269
Tianna RandallWeinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3767-3933
Raquel GallagherWeinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7534-130X
Jennifer E WildesDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0950-4347
Andrea K GrahamDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9736-8906

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Testing Intervention Strategies for Addressing Obesity and Binge EatingK01DK116925 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GRAHAM, ANDREA KASS · 2018 to 2022
$799k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK116925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions that address binge eating and food insecurity are needed. Engaging people with lived experience to understand their needs and preferences could yield important design considerations for such interventions. In this study, people with food insecurity, recurrent binge eating, and obesity completed an interview-based needs assessment to learn facilitators and barriers that they perceive would impact their engagement with a digital intervention for managing binge eating and weight. Twenty adults completed semi-structured interviews. Responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Three themes emerged. Participants shared considerations that impact their ability to access the intervention (e.g., cost of intervention, cost of technology, accessibility across devices), ability to complete intervention recommendations (e.g., affordable healthy meals, education to help stretch groceries, food vouchers, rides to grocery stores, personalized to budget), and preferred intervention features for education, self-monitoring, personalization, support, and motivation/rewards. Engaging people with lived experiences via user-centered design methods revealed important design considerations for a digital intervention to meet this population's needs. Future research is needed to test whether a digital intervention that incorporates these recommendations is engaging and effective for people with binge eating and food insecurity. Findings may have relevance to designing digital interventions for other health problems as well.

Indexed as

Food InsecurityUser-Centered DesignAdultAgedBulimiaCosts and Cost AnalysisDiet, HealthyFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMealsMiddle AgedMotivationNeeds AssessmentObesitybinge eatingdigital interventionfood insecurityobesityuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID34371967
PMCPMC8308534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.