Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34371895›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Cytotoxic, Genotoxic and Senolytic Potential of Native and Micellar Curcumin.

Lea Beltzig, Anna Frumkina, Christian Schwarzenbach, Bernd Kaina

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Effect of curcumin on γ-ray-induced cell response.Journal of radiation research · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lea BeltzigInstitute of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Anna FrumkinaInstitute of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Christian SchwarzenbachInstitute of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-0053
Bernd KainaInstitute of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8217-0809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurcumin, a natural polyphenol and the principal bioactive compound in

methodsWe compared the cytotoxic and genotoxic activity of native curcumin solubilised in ethanol (Cur-E) with curcumin embedded in micells (Cur-M). We measured cell death by MTT assays, apoptosis, necrosis by flow cytometry, senolysis by MTT and C12FDG and genotoxicity by FPG-alkaline and neutral singe-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay).

resultsUsing a variety of primary and established cell lines, we show that Cur-E and Cur-M reduce the viability in all cell types in the same dose range. Cur-E and Cur-M induced dose-dependently apoptosis, but did not exhibit senolytic activity. In the cytotoxic dose range, Cur-E and Cur-M were positive in the alkaline and the neutral comet assay. Genotoxic effects vanished upon removal of curcumin, indicating efficient and complete repair of DNA damage. For inducing cell death, which was measured 48 h after the onset of treatment, permanent exposure was required while 60 min pulse-treatment was ineffective. In all assays, Cur-E and Cur-M were equally active, and the concentration above which significant cytotoxic and genotoxic effects were observed was 10 µM. Micelles not containing curcumin were completely inactive.

conclusionsThe data show that micellar curcumin has the same cytotoxicity and genotoxicity profile as native curcumin. The effective concentration on different cell lines, including primary cells, was far above the curcumin concentration that can be achieved systemically in vivo, which leads us to conclude that native curcumin and curcumin administered as food supplement in a micellar formulation at the ADI level are not cytotoxic/genotoxic, indicating a wide margin of safety.

Indexed as

DNA DamageApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCellular SenescenceComet AssayCurcuminDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CompoundingEthanolHumansLiposomesMicellesNecrosisRisk AssessmentSolubilityCurcuminEthanolLiposomesMicellesSolventsapoptosisbioavailabilitycomet assaycurcumingenotoxicitymicellessenolytics

Identifiers

PMID34371895
PMCPMC8308652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.