Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34371703›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2021

Second-Generation Antimitotics in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Pedro Novais, Patrícia M A Silva, Isabel Amorim, Hassan Bousbaa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Targetable pathways for drug repurposing in gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Time-Lapse Imaging to Analyze Cell Fate in Response to Antimitotics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The two sides of chromosomal instability: drivers and brakes in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  12. Seize the engine: Emerging cell cycle targets in breast cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro NovaisCESPU, Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences and Technologies (IINFACTS), Rua Central de Gandra, 1317, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6483-9807
Patrícia M A SilvaCESPU, Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences and Technologies (IINFACTS), Rua Central de Gandra, 1317, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0694-7321
Isabel AmorimGreenUPorto (Sustainable Agrifood Production) Research Center, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.
Hassan BousbaaCESPU, Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences and Technologies (IINFACTS), Rua Central de Gandra, 1317, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4006-5779
Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário ActivCHIRAL_PI2RL_IINFACTS_2021Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário AntiMitoSphere_APSFCT_IINFACTS_2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitosis represents a promising target to block cancer cell proliferation. Classical antimitotics, mainly microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs), such as taxanes and vinca alkaloids, are amongst the most successful anticancer drugs. By disrupting microtubules, they activate the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which induces a prolonged delay in mitosis, expected to induce cell death. However, resistance, toxicity, and slippage limit the MTA's effectiveness. With the desire to overcome some of the MTA's limitations, mitotic and SAC components have attracted great interest as promising microtubule-independent targets, leading to the so-called second-generation antimitotics (SGAs). The identification of inhibitors against most of these targets, and the promising outcomes achieved in preclinical assays, has sparked the interest of academia and industry. Many of these inhibitors have entered clinical trials; however, they exhibited limited efficacy as monotherapy, and failed to go beyond phase II trials. Combination therapies are emerging as promising strategies to give a second chance to these SGAs. Here, an updated view of the SGAs that reached clinical trials is here provided, together with future research directions, focusing on inhibitors that target the SAC components.

Indexed as

antimitoticscancerclinical trialsmitotic slippagespindle assembly checkpoint

Identifiers

PMID34371703
PMCPMC8309102
OpenAlexW3173661158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.