Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34371138›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2022

Evaluating Treatment Tolerability Using the Toxicity Index With Patient-Reported Outcomes Data.

Blake Langlais, Gina L Mazza, Gita Thanarajasingam, Lauren J Rogak, Brenda Ginos, Narre Heon, Howard I Scher, Gisela Schwab, Patricia A Ganz, Ethan Basch and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effects of a Geriatric Assessment Intervention on Patient-Reported Symptomatic Toxicity in Older Adults With Advanced Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Combining Response and Toxicity Data to Implement Project Optimus.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Simulation study comparing analytical methods for single-item longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Blake LanglaisMayo Clinic, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials (B.L., G.L.M., B.G., A.C.D.), Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Gina L MazzaMayo Clinic, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials (B.L., G.L.M., B.G., A.C.D.), Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Gita ThanarajasingamMayo Clinic, Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic (G.T.), Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Lauren J RogakMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (L.J.R., N.H., H.I.S., E.B.), New York, New York, USA.
Brenda GinosMayo Clinic, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials (B.L., G.L.M., B.G., A.C.D.), Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Narre HeonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (L.J.R., N.H., H.I.S., E.B.), New York, New York, USA.
Howard I ScherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (L.J.R., N.H., H.I.S., E.B.), New York, New York, USA.
Gisela SchwabExelixis, Inc. (G.S.), Alameda, California, USA.
Patricia A GanzDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (P.G.), Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ethan BaschMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (L.J.R., N.H., H.I.S., E.B.), New York, New York, USA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina (E.B.), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Amylou C DueckMayo Clinic, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials (B.L., G.L.M., B.G., A.C.D.), Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Electronic address: dueck.amylou@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USExelixis (United States) · USMayo Clinic · USUCLA Health · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Keith L. Knutson · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Advancing Analysis and Interpretation ofAdverse Events and PROs in Cancer Clinical TrialsU01CA232859 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI GANZ, PATRICIA A., TIGHIOUART, MOURAD · 2018 to 2023
$3.7M
Analyzing and Interpreting PRO-CTCAE with CTCAE and Other Clinical Data to Characterize Drug TolerabilityU01CA233046 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BASCH, ETHAN M., DUECK, AMYLOU CONSTANCE · 2018 to 2023
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232859NCI NIH HHS U01 CA233046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSummarizing longitudinal symptomatic adverse events during clinical trials is necessary for understanding treatment tolerability. The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) provides insight for capturing treatment tolerability within trials. Tolerability summary measures, such as the maximum score, are often used to communicate the potential negative symptoms both in the medical literature and directly to patients. Commonly, the proportions of present and severe symptomatic adverse events are used and reported between treatment arms among adverse event types. The toxicity index is also a summary measure previously applied to clinician-reported CTCAE data.

objectivesApply the toxicity index to PRO-CTCAE data from the COMET-2 trial alongside the maximum score, then present and discuss considerations for using the toxicity index as a summary measure for communicating tolerability to patients and clinicians.

methodsProportions of maximum PRO-CTCAE severity levels and median toxicity index were computed by arm using all trial data and adjusting for baseline symptoms.

resultsGroup-wise statistical differences were similar whether using severity level proportions or the toxicity index. The impact of adjusting for baseline symptoms was equivalently seen when comparing arms using severity rates or the toxicity index.

conclusionThe toxicity index is a useful method when ranking patients from those with the least to most symptomatic adverse event burden. This study showed the toxicity index can be applied to PRO-CTCAE data. Though as a tolerability summary measure, further study is needed to provide a clear clinical or patient-facing interpretation of the toxicity index.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresClinical Trials as TopicHumanscancer clinical trialspatient-reported outcomesPRO-CTCAEsymptomatic adverse eventtolerabilitytoxicity index

Identifiers

PMID34371138
PMCPMC8816875
OpenAlexW3188858150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.