Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370972›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2021

Cerebral venous thrombosis after vaccination against COVID-19 in the UK: a multicentre cohort study.

Richard J Perry, Arina Tamborska, Bhagteshwar Singh, Brian Craven, Richard Marigold, Peter Arthur-Farraj, Jing Ming Yeo, Liqun Zhang, Ghaniah Hassan-Smith, Matthew Jones and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
36.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Thrombosis patterns and clinical outcome of COVID-19 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Bibliometric Analysis of the Composition of Landmark Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Research.International journal of cerebrovascular disease and stroke · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Richard J PerryComprehensive Stroke Service, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. Electronic address: richard.perry2@nhs.net.
Arina TamborskaNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Bhagteshwar SinghNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Tropical and Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Brian CravenDepartment of Haematology, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Richard MarigoldDepartment of Stroke Medicine, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton UK.
Peter Arthur-FarrajJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, UK.
Jing Ming YeoQueen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Liqun ZhangDepartment of Neurology, St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ghaniah Hassan-SmithDepartment of Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Matthew JonesManchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Christopher HutchcroftManchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Esther HobsonRoyal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Dana WarcelDepartment of Haematology, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Daniel WhiteDepartment of Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Phillip FerdinandStroke Service, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Alastair WebbNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Tom SolomonNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Marie ScullyDepartment of Haematology, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Haemostasis Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.
David J WerringComprehensive Stroke Service, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Christine RoffeStroke Service, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
CVT After Immunisation Against COVID-19 (CAIAC) collaborators
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V033441/1Wellcome Trust 206589/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA new syndrome of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has emerged as a rare side-effect of vaccination against COVID-19. Cerebral venous thrombosis is the most common manifestation of this syndrome but, to our knowledge, has not previously been described in detail. We aimed to document the features of post-vaccination cerebral venous thrombosis with and without VITT and to assess whether VITT is associated with poorer outcomes.

methodsFor this multicentre cohort study, clinicians were asked to submit all cases in which COVID-19 vaccination preceded the onset of cerebral venous thrombosis, regardless of the type of vaccine, interval between vaccine and onset of cerebral venous thrombosis symptoms, or blood test results. We collected clinical characteristics, laboratory results (including the results of tests for anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies where available), and radiological features at hospital admission of patients with cerebral venous thrombosis after vaccination against COVID-19, with no exclusion criteria. We defined cerebral venous thrombosis cases as VITT-associated if the lowest platelet count recorded during admission was below 150 × 10

findingsBetween April 1 and May 20, 2021, we received data on 99 patients from collaborators in 43 hospitals across the UK. Four patients were excluded because they did not have definitive evidence of cerebral venous thrombosis on imaging. Of the remaining 95 patients, 70 had VITT and 25 did not. The median age of the VITT group (47 years, IQR 32-55) was lower than in the non-VITT group (57 years; 41-62; p=0·0045). Patients with VITT-associated cerebral venous thrombosis had more intracranial veins thrombosed (median three, IQR 2-4) than non-VITT patients (two, 2-3; p=0·041) and more frequently had extracranial thrombosis (31 [44%] of 70 patients) compared with non-VITT patients (one [4%] of 25 patients; p=0·0003). The primary outcome of death or dependency occurred more frequently in patients with VITT-associated cerebral venous thrombosis (33 [47%] of 70 patients) compared with the non-VITT control group (four [16%] of 25 patients; p=0·0061). This adverse outcome was less frequent in patients with VITT who received non-heparin anticoagulants (18 [36%] of 50 patients) compared with those who did not (15 [75%] of 20 patients; p=0·0031), and in those who received intravenous immunoglobulin (22 [40%] of 55 patients) compared with those who did not (11 [73%] of 15 patients; p=0·022).

interpretationCerebral venous thrombosis is more severe in the context of VITT. Non-heparin anticoagulants and immunoglobulin treatment might improve outcomes of VITT-associated cerebral venous thrombosis. Since existing criteria excluded some patients with otherwise typical VITT-associated cerebral venous thrombosis, we propose new diagnostic criteria that are more appropriate.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansIntracranial ThrombosisMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet CountPurpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicSARS-CoV-2United KingdomVaccinationVenous ThrombosisCOVID-19 VaccinesFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment D

Identifiers

PMID34370972
PMCPMC8346241
OpenAlexW3189655560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.