Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370903›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2021

The DEN and CCl

Takeki Uehara, Igor P Pogribny, Ivan Rusyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takeki UeharaStrategic Development Department, Shionogi & Co., Osaka, Japan.
Igor P PogribnyNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas.
Ivan RusynDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

Funding

STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS OF FLOW AND TRANSPORT PHENOMENAP42ES005948 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRY, REBECCA · 1992 to 2017
$45.4M
Bioengineering partnership to improve chemical hazard testing paradigmsR01ES015241 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUSYN, IVAN · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
Metabolomic and Toxicogenetic Study of Ethanol ToxicityR01AA016258 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUSYN, IVAN · 2005 to 2009
$2.5M
Genes, genomes, and genotoxicity: in vivo epigenetic toxicology of 1,3-butadieneR01ES023195 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CRAWFORD, GREGORY E, FUREY, TERRENCE S. · 2013 to 2016
$2.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016258NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES005948NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015241NIH HHS P42 ES005948NIH HHS R01 ES015241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops most often as a complication of fibrosis or cirrhosis. Although most human studies of HCC provide crucial insights into the molecular signatures of HCC, they seldom address its etiology. Mouse models provide essential tools for investigating the pathogenesis of HCC, but the majority of rodent cancer models do not feature liver fibrosis. Detailed here is a protocol for an experimental mouse model of HCC that arises in association with advanced liver fibrosis. The disease model is induced by a single injection of N-nitrosodiethylamine (DEN) at 2 weeks of age followed by repeated administration of carbon tetrachloride (CCl

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalAnimalsHumansInflammationLiver CirrhosisMicecancerfibrosisgenotoxiclivermechanisms

Identifiers

PMID34370903
PMCPMC8744072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.