Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370833›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2021

Three-dimensional simulation of aesthetic outcome from breast-conserving surgery compared with viewing photographs or standard care: randomized clinical trial.

A R Godden, A Micha, L M Wolf, C Pitches, P A Barry, A A Khan, K D C Krupa, A M Kirby, J E Rusby

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03250260 (The Use of 3D Surface Imaging to Simulate Outcome After Breast Conserving Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03250260 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Use of 3D Surface Imaging to Simulate Outcome After Breast Conserving Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRan2017 to 2023Enrolled117ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArms3-dimensional photograph with simulation, Viewing of a 2-dimensional photographic library
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Preoperative 3-dimensional Simulation in Aesthetic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A R GoddenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9781-6097
A MichaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
L M WolfDepartment of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
C PitchesIndependent patient co-designer, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
P A BarryDepartment of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
A A KhanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
K D C KrupaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
A M KirbyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
J E RusbyDepartment of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver half of women with surgically managed breast cancer in the UK undergo breast-conserving treatment (BCT). While photographs are shown prior to reconstructive surgery or complex oncoplastic procedures, standard practice prior to breast conservation is to simply describe the likely aesthetic changes. Patients have expressed the desire for more personalized information about likely appearance after surgery. The hypothesis was that viewing a three-dimensional (3D) simulation improves patients' confidence in knowing their likely aesthetic outcome after surgery.

methodsA randomized, controlled trial of 117 women planning unilateral BCT was undertaken. The randomization was three-way: standard of care (verbal description alone, control group), viewing two-dimensional (2D) photographs, or viewing a 3D simulation before surgery. The primary endpoint was the comparison between groups' median answer on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for the question administered before surgery: 'How confident are you that you know how your breasts are likely to look after treatment?'

resultsThe median VAS in the control group was 5.2 (i.q.r. 2.6-7.8); 8.0 (i.q.r. 5.7-8.7) for 2D photography, and 8.9 (i.q.r. 8.2-9.5) for 3D simulation. There was a significant difference between groups (P < 0.010) with post-hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrating a statistically significant difference between 3D simulation and both standard care and viewing 2D photographs (P < 0.010 and P = 0.012, respectively).

conclusionThis RCT has demonstrated that women who viewed an individualized 3D simulation of likely aesthetic outcome for BCT were more confident going into surgery than those who received standard care or who were shown 2D photographs of other women. The impact on longer-term satisfaction with outcome remains to be determined.Registration number: NCT03250260 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEstheticsImaging, Three-DimensionalAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammaplastyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPhotography

Identifiers

PMID34370833
PMCPMC10364871
OpenAlexW3187399939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.