Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370826›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2021

Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women.

A Duncan, C Maslen, C Gibson, T Hartshorne, A Farooqi, A Saratzis, M J Bown

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Growth prediction model for abdominal aortic aneurysms.The British journal of surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A DuncanDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
C MaslenDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
C GibsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
T HartshorneLeicester Vascular Institute, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
A FarooqiLeicester City Clinical Commissioning Group, Leicester, UK.
A SaratzisDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-094X
M J BownDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences & National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GBGlenfield Hospital · GBLeicester City Council · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/18/10/33842Department of Health NIHR300059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-wide ultrasound screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men have already been established in some countries. Women account for one third of aneurysm-related mortality and are four times more likely to experience an AAA rupture than men. Whole-population screening for AAA in women is unlikely to be clinically or economically effective. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of a targeted AAA screening programme for women at high risk of AAA.

methodWomen aged 65-74 years deemed at high risk of having an AAA (current smokers, ex-smokers, or with a history of coronary artery disease) were invited to attend ultrasound screening (July 2016 to March 2019) for AAA in the Female Aneurysm screening STudy (FAST). Primary outcomes were attendance for screening and prevalence of AAA. Biometric data, medical history, quality of life (QoL) and aortic diameter on ultrasound imaging were recorded prospectively.

resultsSome 6037 women were invited and 5200 attended screening (86.7 per cent). Fifteen AAAs larger than 29 mm were detected (prevalence 0.29 (95 per cent c.i. 0.18 to 0.48) per cent). Current smokers had the highest prevalence (0.83 (95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 1.89) per cent) but lowest attendance (75.2 per cent). Three AAAs greater than 5.5 cm were identified and referred for consideration of surgical repair; one woman underwent repair. There was a significant reduction in patient-reported QoL scores following screening.

conclusionA low prevalence of AAA was detected in high-risk women, with lowest screening uptake in those at highest risk. Screening for AAA in high-risk women may not be beneficial.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalCoronary Artery DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPrevalenceQuality of LifeRisk FactorsSmokingUltrasonographyUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34370826
PMCPMC8545265
OpenAlexW3187451579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.