Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370789›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2021

NAD+ pool depletion as a signal for the Rex regulon involved in Streptococcus agalactiae virulence.

Thierry Franza, Annika Rogstam, Saravanamuthu Thiyagarajan, Matthew J Sullivan, Aurelie Derré-Bobillot, Mikael C Bauer, Kelvin G K Goh, Violette Da Cunha, Philippe Glaser, Derek T Logan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systematic analysis of the glucose-PTS inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Butyrate enhancesJournal of bacteriology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Thierry FranzaMicalis Institute, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Annika RogstamDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Saravanamuthu ThiyagarajanDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6960-2729
Matthew J SullivanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2276-3132
Aurelie Derré-BobillotMicalis Institute, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Mikael C BauerDepartment of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kelvin G K GohSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-2043
Violette Da CunhaInstitut Pasteur, Unité Ecologie et Evolution de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques, CNRS UMR 3525, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9035-7825
Philippe GlaserInstitut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Pathogènes à Gram Positif, Paris, France.
Derek T LoganDepartment of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-8560
Glen C UlettSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-8091
Claes von WachenfeldtDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8950-3218
Philippe GauduMicalis Institute, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Lund University · SEAgroParisTech · FRGriffith University · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many Gram-positive bacteria, the redox-sensing transcriptional repressor Rex controls central carbon and energy metabolism by sensing the intra cellular balance between the reduced and oxidized forms of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; the NADH/NAD+ ratio. Here, we report high-resolution crystal structures and characterization of a Rex ortholog (Gbs1167) in the opportunistic pathogen, Streptococcus agalactiae, also known as group B streptococcus (GBS). We present structures of Rex bound to NAD+ and to a DNA operator which are the first structures of a Rex-family member from a pathogenic bacterium. The structures reveal the molecular basis of DNA binding and the conformation alterations between the free NAD+ complex and DNA-bound form of Rex. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that GBS Rex controls not only central metabolism, but also expression of the monocistronic rex gene as well as virulence gene expression. Rex enhances GBS virulence after disseminated infection in mice. Mechanistically, NAD+ stabilizes Rex as a repressor in the absence of NADH. However, GBS Rex is unique compared to Rex regulators previously characterized because of its sensing mechanism: we show that it primarily responds to NAD+ levels (or growth rate) rather than to the NADH/NAD+ ratio. These results indicate that Rex plays a key role in GBS pathogenicity by modulating virulence factor gene expression and carbon metabolism to harvest nutrients from the host.

Indexed as

RegulonVirulenceAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Products, rexMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLNADProtein BindingProtein ConformationStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiaeBacterial ProteinsGene Products, rexNAD

Identifiers

PMID34370789
PMCPMC8376106
OpenAlexW3187506932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.