Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370761›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Study protocol: One plus one can be greater than two-Ecological momentary assessment for Black prostate cancer survivors and partners.

Dalnim Cho, Kathrin Milbury, Yue Liao, Curtis A Pettaway, Justin R Gregg, Yisheng Li, Lorna H McNeill

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dalnim ChoDepartment of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-6846
Kathrin MilburyDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Yue LiaoDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-336X
Curtis A PettawayDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Justin R GreggDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Yisheng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9847-8544
Lorna H McNeillDepartment of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · US

Funding

Targeting Tumor Microenvironment-Induced Therapy Resistance in Prostate Cancer Bone MetastasisP50CA140388 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI THOMPSON, TIMOTHY CHARLES · 2009 to 2022
$23.4M
One Plus One Can Be Greater than Two: Ecological Momentary Assessment for Black Prostate Cancer Survivors and PartnersR21CA245687 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHO, DALNIM · 2020 to 2021
$417k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140388NCI NIH HHS R21 CA245687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that romantic partners play a pivotal role in patients' survivorship period, integrating partners into survivorship care and broadening the focus of behavioral interventions from the individual (survivor) to the survivor-partner dyad may make healthy lifestyle behaviors more easily adopted and potentially maintained. Understanding the role of dyadic processes in Black survivors is particularly important because their lifestyle behaviors are poor and they have higher cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. To develop an effective dyadic lifestyle behavior intervention for Black survivors, micro-level investigations of interactions between Black survivors and their partners are necessary to pinpoint how survivors and partners facilitate or hinder each other's lifestyle behaviors in their natural, everyday lives. Accordingly, the objective of the present study is to fill these gaps using ecological momentary assessment to eventually develop more effective lifestyle interventions for Black prostate cancer (PCa) survivors and partners. A total of 120 dyads (i.e., 240 individuals) who are Black adult survivors diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa and their romantic partners will be asked to complete four assessments per day for 14 consecutive days on a smartphone after an initial retrospective survey. Over the 14 days, participants will be asked to complete a brief survey regarding their lifestyle behaviors (physical activity, sedentariness and eating behaviors), contexts of lifestyle behaviors, stress, and coping. Physical activity and sedentary behavior will be assessed via accelerometer; eating behaviors will be assessed with the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool. After completing the 14-day assessment, participants will be asked to complete a final retrospective survey. Results of the proposed study will inform the rigorous development of a theory-based dyadic lifestyle intervention in this vulnerable survivorship population with the ultimate goal to improve overall survival and reduce morbidities (for survivors) and reduce cancer incidence (for partners).

Indexed as

Life StyleQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalBlack or African AmericanCancer SurvivorsEcological Momentary AssessmentExerciseHealth BehaviorHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34370761
PMCPMC8351991
OpenAlexW3190324167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.