Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370724›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Label-free imaging and classification of live P. falciparum enables high performance parasitemia quantification without fixation or staining.

Paul Lebel, Rebekah Dial, Venkata N P Vemuri, Valentina Garcia, Joseph DeRisi, Rafael Gómez-Sjöberg

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Remoscope: a label-free imaging cytometer for malaria diagnostics.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  3. Automated Image Analysis for Detection of Coccidia in Poultry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning for microscopic examination of protozoan parasites.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul LebelChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4569-1493
Rebekah DialDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1984-0360
Venkata N P VemuriChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5748-9594
Valentina GarciaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-0882
Joseph DeRisiChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4611-9205
Rafael Gómez-SjöbergChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8017-9669

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual microscopic inspection of fixed and stained blood smears has remained the gold standard for Plasmodium parasitemia analysis for over a century. Unfortunately, smear preparation consumes time and reagents, while manual microscopy is skill-dependent and labor-intensive. Here, we demonstrate that deep learning enables both life stage classification and accurate parasitemia quantification of ordinary brightfield microscopy images of live, unstained red blood cells. We tested our method using both a standard light microscope equipped with visible and near-ultraviolet (UV) illumination, and a custom-built microscope employing deep-UV illumination. While using deep-UV light achieved an overall four-category classification of Plasmodium falciparum blood stages of greater than 99% and a recall of 89.8% for ring-stage parasites, imaging with near-UV light on a standard microscope resulted in 96.8% overall accuracy and over 90% recall for ring-stage parasites. Both imaging systems were tested extrinsically by parasitemia titration, revealing superior performance over manually-scored Giemsa-stained smears, and a limit of detection below 0.1%. Our results establish that label-free parasitemia analysis of live cells is possible in a biomedical laboratory setting without the need for complex optical instrumentation. We anticipate future extensions of this work could enable label-free clinical diagnostic measurements, one day eliminating the need for conventional blood smear analysis.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedErythrocytesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMalaria, FalciparumMicroscopy, UltravioletNeural Networks, ComputerParasitemiaPlasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID34370724
PMCPMC8376094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.