Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370496›Full record

ReviewPsychological review2022

From social contingency to verbal reference: A constructivist hypothesis.

Elena Luchkina, Fei Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Talking About the Absent and the Abstract: Referential Communication in Language and Gesture.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  2. Leader-follower dynamics during early social interactions matter for infant word learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Toddlers' prior social experience with speakers influences their word learning.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elena LuchkinaDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-9367
Fei XuDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-8220-7528

Funding

Developmental origins and downstream consequences of abstract verbal referenceF32HD104408 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LUCHKINA, ELENA · 2021 to 2023
$150k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD104408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the first year of life, infants' word learning is slow, laborious, and requires repeated exposure to word-referent co-occurrences. In contrast, by 14-18 months, infants learn words from just a few labeling events, use joint attention and eye gaze to decipher word meaning, and begin to use speech to communicate about absent things. We propose that this remarkable advancement in word learning results from attaining a

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentVerbal LearningHumansInfantLanguageLearningSemantics

Identifiers

PMID34370496
PMCPMC10312134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.