Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370193›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Pharmaceuticals in drinking water sources and tap water in a city in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River: occurrence, spatiotemporal distribution, and risk assessment.

Peng He, Junmei Wu, Jingqian Peng, Lin Wei, Liping Zhang, Qiaohong Zhou, Zhenbin Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of PVA/TiOMembranes · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng HeSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Junmei WuState Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China. wujunmei@ihb.ac.cn.
Jingqian PengWuhan Academy of Environmental Protection Sciences, Wuhan, 430015, China.
Lin WeiWuhan Academy of Environmental Protection Sciences, Wuhan, 430015, China.
Liping ZhangState Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Qiaohong ZhouState Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Zhenbin WuState Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China. wuzb@ihb.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNHubei Academy of Environmental Sciences · CNInstitute of Hydrobiology · CN

Funding

Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute CKWV2017536/KYChinese Academy of Science XDA23040401Wuhan Academy of Environmental Protection Sciences HKY-2019-KY03-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of ten target pharmaceuticals was investigated in drinking water sources and tap water in a city in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, including erythromycin (ERY), roxithromycin (RTM), ciprofloxacin (CPX), ofloxacin (OFX), sulfadiazine (SDZ), sulfamethoxazole (SMX), oxytetracycline (OTC), tetracycline (TC), ibuprofen (IBF), and naproxen (NPX). And the corresponding ecological risk for three classes of aquatic organisms and human health risk for different life stages were estimated. Results demonstrated that nine pharmaceuticals except for TC were detected with the frequencies of 20-100% and the concentrations of <LOQ-118.60 ng/L in drinking water sources. Only SMX and IBF were detected quantitatively with the highest concentrations of 0.69 ng/L and 1.28 ng/L in tap water, respectively. The concentrations of the target pharmaceuticals were lower than or comparable with those in other drinking water systems. The spatiotemporal variations of the target pharmaceuticals might be mainly attributed to their usage object, emission amount, and natural attenuation. The overall discrepancy of concentrations between drinking water sources and tap water might indicate the purification effect of drinking water treatment system. Individual pharmaceutical in drinking water resources posed negligible risks to invertebrate and fish; however, ERY, CPX, OFX, and SMX posed high risk to algae. Moreover, pharmaceutical exposure by tap water caused no risk to human health. Nevertheless, the long-term, chronic, and mixed risks of pharmaceuticals and the potential risk of antibiotic-resistant genes should be concerned. This study enriches environmental monitoring data of pharmaceuticals in drinking water sources and tap water, and provides scientific information for emerging pollutants management in drinking water system.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterPharmaceutical PreparationsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsChinaEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRisk AssessmentRiversDrinking WaterPharmaceutical PreparationsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAntibioticsDrinking water systemEcological riskHuman health riskPharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID34370193
OpenAlexW3192790709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.