Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370170›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2021

Second Tier Testing to Reduce the Number of Non-actionable Secondary Findings and False-Positive Referrals in Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.

Maartje Blom, Ingrid Pico-Knijnenburg, Sandra Imholz, Lotte Vissers, Janika Schulze, Jeannette Werner, Robbert Bredius, Mirjam van der Burg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing TREC- and KREC-based newborn screening: Risk-stratified algorithms significantly reduce referrals.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Demographic, clinical, immunological, and molecular features of iranian national cohort of patients with defect in DCLRE1C gene.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  15. Case report:Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  16. Future Perspectives of Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Immunity.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. First Year of TREC-Based National SCID Screening in Sweden.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maartje BlomDepartment of Pediatrics, Laboratory for Pediatric Immunology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ingrid Pico-KnijnenburgDepartment of Pediatrics, Laboratory for Pediatric Immunology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sandra ImholzCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Lotte VissersDepartment of Pediatrics, Laboratory for Pediatric Immunology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Janika SchulzeDepartment of Research and Development, Epimune GmbH, Belin, Germany.
Jeannette WernerDepartment of Research and Development, Epimune GmbH, Belin, Germany.
Robbert BrediusDepartment of Pediatrics, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Mirjam van der BurgDepartment of Pediatrics, Laboratory for Pediatric Immunology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands. m.van_der_burg@lumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNewborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is based on the detection of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs). TRECs are a sensitive biomarker for T-cell lymphopenia, but not specific for SCID. This creates a palette of secondary findings associated with low T-cells that require follow-up and treatment or are non-actionable. The high rate of (non-actionable) secondary findings and false-positive referrals raises questions about the harm-benefit-ratio of SCID screening, as referrals are associated with high emotional impact and anxiety for parents.

methodsAn alternative quantitative TREC PCR with different primers was performed on NBS cards of referred newborns (N = 56) and epigenetic immune cell counting was used as for relative quantification of CD3 + T-cells (N = 59). Retrospective data was used to determine the reduction in referrals with a lower TREC cutoff value or an adjusted screening algorithm.

resultsWhen analyzed with a second PCR with different primers, 45% of the referrals (25/56) had TREC levels above cutoff, including four false-positive cases in which two SNPs were identified. With epigenetic qPCR, 41% (24/59) of the referrals were within the range of the relative CD3 + T-cell counts of the healthy controls. Lowering the TREC cutoff value or adjusting the screening algorithm led to lower referral rates but did not prevent all false-positive referrals.

conclusionsSecond tier tests and adjustments of cutoff values or screening algorithms all have the potential to reduce the number of non-actionable secondary findings in NBS for SCID, although second tier tests are more effective in preventing false-positive referrals.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFalse Positive ReactionsHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyReceptors, Antigen, T-CellEpigenetic immune cell countingInborn errors of immunityNewborn screeningNext-generation sequencingNGSSCIDSecond tierSevere combined immunodeficiencyTRECs

Identifiers

PMID34370170
PMCPMC8604867
OpenAlexW3190462833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.