Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370128›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2021

Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality of life outcomes in trauma patients: a scoping review.

Siddarth Daniels David, Nobhojit Roy, Harris Solomon, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg, Martin Gerdin Wärnberg

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient and process factors associated with opportunities for improvement in trauma care: a registry-based study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Mental Health Screening in a Rural Trauma Center: Feasibility and Impact.Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Siddarth Daniels DavidHealth Systems and Policy, Department of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. siddarth.david@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4848-2358
Nobhojit RoyHealth Systems and Policy, Department of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Harris SolomonDepartment of Cultural Anthropology and the Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Cecilia Stålsby LundborgHealth Systems and Policy, Department of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin Gerdin WärnbergHealth Systems and Policy, Department of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEDuke University · USKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTrauma is a global public health challenge. Measuring post-discharge socioeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes can help better understand and reduce the consequences of trauma.

methodsWe performed a scoping review to map the existing research on post-discharge outcomes for trauma patients, irrespective of the country or setting in which the study was performed. The scoping review was conducted by searching six databases - MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Global Index Medicus, BASE, and Web of Science - to identify all articles that report post-discharge socioeconomic or quality of life outcomes in trauma patients from 2009 to 2018.

resultsSeven hundred fifty-eight articles were included in this study, extracting 958 outcomes. Most studies (82%) were from high-income countries (HICs). More studies from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were cross-sectional (71%) compared with HIC settings (46%). There was a wide variety of different definitions, interpretations, and measurements used by various articles for similar outcomes. Quality of life, return to work, social support, cost, and participation were the main outcomes studied in post-discharge trauma patients.

conclusionsThe wide range of outcomes and outcome measures reported across different types of injuries and settings. This variability can be a barrier when comparing across different types of injuries and settings. Post-discharge trauma studies should move towards building evidence based on standardized measurement of outcomes.

Indexed as

InjuryPost-dischargeScoping reviewSocioeconomic outcomesTrauma

Identifiers

PMID34370128
PMCPMC8353045
OpenAlexW3189777356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.