Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370115›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2021

Using point-of-care diagnostic testing for improved antibiotic prescription: an economic model.

F Antoñanzas, C A Juárez-Castelló, R Rodríguez-Ibeas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Point of care antimicrobial susceptibility testing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Perspective on the Integration of Diagnostic Algorithms for Fever Management.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Does diagnostic testing always decrease antibiotics prescriptions?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F AntoñanzasDepartment of Economics, University of La Rioja, La Cigüeña 60, 26004, Logroño, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6122-9130
C A Juárez-CastellóDepartment of Economics, University of La Rioja, La Cigüeña 60, 26004, Logroño, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0816-032X
R Rodríguez-IbeasDepartment of Economics, University of La Rioja, La Cigüeña 60, 26004, Logroño, Spain. roberto.rodriguez@unirioja.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-7993
Universidad de La Rioja · ES

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 820755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics have been overprescribed to treat infectious diseases and have generated antimicrobial resistances that reduce their effectiveness. Following the rationale behind the new paradigm of personalized medicine, point-of-care diagnostic testing (POCT) has been proposed to improve the quality of antibiotic prescription with the aim of reducing antimicrobial resistances.

methodsIn order to understand whether this recommendation is valid, we create a theoretical economic model to determine under which conditions the expected benefits of using POCT to guide antibiotic prescription are greater than for empiric prescription, where we define the expected benefits as the difference between the economic value of health and the costs of the treatment. We consider the interaction of a group of physicians who express differing levels of uncertainty when prescribing with a firm selling a diagnostic device, and analyse the firm's pricing policy and the physicians' prescribing decisions. We allow the physicians to internalize the external costs of antimicrobial resistances.

resultsWe find that the use of POCT reduces the number of antibiotic prescriptions. The reduction in antibiotic prescriptions is higher when physicians internalise the costs of antimicrobial resistances. Physicians with relatively high levels of uncertainty use POCT as they are uncertain about the right treatment for a large proportion of patients. Physicians with low levels of uncertainty prefer to prescribe empirically. The segmentation in the population of physicians regarding the uptake of POCT depends on the distribution of levels of uncertainty across physicians. For each test, the firm charges the marginal production costs of the inputs needed to administer the test, and makes its profit from the sales of the testing devices.

conclusionsFrom a theoretical perspective, our findings corroborate the fact that POCT improve the quality of antibiotic prescription and reduce the number of prescriptions. Nevertheless, their use is not always recommended as empiric therapy may be preferred when uncertainty is low.

Indexed as

AntibioticsDiagnostic testsInfectious diseasesPoint of carePrescriptions

Identifiers

PMID34370115
PMCPMC8351365
OpenAlexW3190617559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.