ArticleHealth economics review2021
Using point-of-care diagnostic testing for improved antibiotic prescription: an economic model.
Article in Health economics review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Conventional Detection to Point-of-care Tests (POCT) Method for Pediatric Respiratory Infections Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of Point-of-Care Rapid Diagnostic Tests on Antibiotic Prescription Among Patients Aged <18 Years in Primary Healthcare Settings in 2 Peri-Urban Districts in Ghana: Randomized Controlled Trial Results.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Trial
- Point of care antimicrobial susceptibility testing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Exploring factors contributing to antibiotic resistance: A cross-sectional empirical study in Bangladesh.PloS one · 2026Article
- Designing the Future of Biosensing: Advances in Aptamer Discovery, Computational Modeling, and Diagnostic Applications.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Progress on the Global Research Agenda for Antimicrobial Resistance in Human Health in Pakistan: Findings and Implications.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
- Primary care during COVID-19 pandemic - a survey to establish clinical needs and lessons learned in infectious respiratory diseases in Spain.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Leading reasons for antibiotic prescriptions in pediatric respiratory infections: influence of fever in a primary care setting.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Observational
- Perspective on the Integration of Diagnostic Algorithms for Fever Management.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Article
- Does diagnostic testing always decrease antibiotics prescriptions?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023Article
- Family doctors' roles and perceptions on antibiotic consumption and antibiotic resistance in Romania: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Novel Host Response-Based Diagnostics to Differentiate the Etiology of Fever in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessing, Pricing and Funding Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Tract Infections-Overview of Policies Applied in 17 European Countries.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Advances in diagnostic tools for respiratory tract infections: from tuberculosis to COVID-19 - changing paradigms?ERJ open research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotics have been overprescribed to treat infectious diseases and have generated antimicrobial resistances that reduce their effectiveness. Following the rationale behind the new paradigm of personalized medicine, point-of-care diagnostic testing (POCT) has been proposed to improve the quality of antibiotic prescription with the aim of reducing antimicrobial resistances.
methodsIn order to understand whether this recommendation is valid, we create a theoretical economic model to determine under which conditions the expected benefits of using POCT to guide antibiotic prescription are greater than for empiric prescription, where we define the expected benefits as the difference between the economic value of health and the costs of the treatment. We consider the interaction of a group of physicians who express differing levels of uncertainty when prescribing with a firm selling a diagnostic device, and analyse the firm's pricing policy and the physicians' prescribing decisions. We allow the physicians to internalize the external costs of antimicrobial resistances.
resultsWe find that the use of POCT reduces the number of antibiotic prescriptions. The reduction in antibiotic prescriptions is higher when physicians internalise the costs of antimicrobial resistances. Physicians with relatively high levels of uncertainty use POCT as they are uncertain about the right treatment for a large proportion of patients. Physicians with low levels of uncertainty prefer to prescribe empirically. The segmentation in the population of physicians regarding the uptake of POCT depends on the distribution of levels of uncertainty across physicians. For each test, the firm charges the marginal production costs of the inputs needed to administer the test, and makes its profit from the sales of the testing devices.
conclusionsFrom a theoretical perspective, our findings corroborate the fact that POCT improve the quality of antibiotic prescription and reduce the number of prescriptions. Nevertheless, their use is not always recommended as empiric therapy may be preferred when uncertainty is low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.