Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370078›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

Association of age with response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

David D'Andrea, Peter C Black, Homayoun Zargar, Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari, Francesco Soria, Adrian S Fairey, Laura S Mertens, Colin P Dinney, Maria C Mir, Laura-Maria Krabbe and 30 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A population-based analysis of patterns of care in patients with de novo muscle-invasive bladder cancer from Alberta, Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

David D'AndreaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Peter C BlackDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Homayoun ZargarDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kamran Zargar-ShoshtariDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Francesco SoriaDepartment of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Adrian S FaireyUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Laura S MertensDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Colin P DinneyDepartment of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Maria C MirGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Laura-Maria KrabbeDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Michael S CooksonDepartment of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Niels-Erik JacobsenUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jeffrey S MontgomeryDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Evan Y YuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Evanguelos XylinasDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Nicholas J CampainDepartment of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Wassim KassoufDepartment of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Marc A Dall'EraDepartment of Urology, Davis Medical Center, University of California At Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Jo-An SeahPrincess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cesar E ErcoleGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Simon HorenblasDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Srikala S SridharPrincess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John S McGrathDepartment of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Jonathan AningDepartment of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.
Jonathan L WrightDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew C ThorpeDepartment of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Todd M MorganDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeff M HolzbeierleinDepartment of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Trinity J BivalacquaDepartment of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Scott NorthCross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Daniel A BarocasDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Petros GrivasDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew J StephensonGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jay B ShahDepartment of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Bas W van RhijnDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Siamak DaneshmandUSC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Philippe E SpiessDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. sfshariat@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6627-6179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the association of patient age with response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed data from 1105 patients with MIBC. Patients age was evaluated as continuous variable and stratified in quartiles. Pathologic objective response (pOR; ypT0-Ta-Tis-T1N0) and pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0N0), as well survival outcomes were assessed. We used data of 395 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate the prevalence of TCGA molecular subtypes and DNA damage repair (DDR) gene alterations according to patient age.

resultspOR was achieved in 40% of patients. There was no difference in distribution of pOR or pCR between age quartiles. On univariable logistic regression analysis, patient age was not associated with pOR or pCR when evaluated as continuous variables or stratified in quartiles (all p > 0.3). Median follow-up was 18 months (IQR 6-37). On Cox regression and competing risk regression analyses, age was not associated with survival outcomes (all p > 0.05). In the TCGA cohort, patient with age ≤ 60 years has 7% less DDR gene mutations (p = 0.59). We found higher age distribution in patients with luminal (p < 0.001) and luminal infiltrated (p = 0.002) compared to those with luminal papillary subtype.

conclusionsWhile younger patients may have less mutational tumor burden, our analysis failed to show an association of age with response to preoperative chemotherapy or survival outcomes. Therefore, the use of preoperative chemotherapy should be considered regardless of patient age.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgeBladder cancerChemotherapyResponse

Identifiers

PMID34370078
PMCPMC8602146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.