ReviewScience and engineering ethics2021
The Moral Consideration of Artificial Entities: A Literature Review.
Review in Science and engineering ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological and behavioural responses in human-agent vs. human-human interactions.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Heartless Rulez! Mechanical objectivity, empathic understanding, and the permissibility of AI.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Implicit measures of anthropomorphism: affective priming and recognition of apparent animal emotions.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Theory of Mind and Preference Learning at the Interface of Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and AI: A Review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Whether to Save a Robot or a Human: On the Ethical and Legal Limits of Protections for Robots.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Protecting Sentient Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Lay Intuitions on Standing, Personhood, and General Legal Protection.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Challenging the Neo-Anthropocentric Relational Approach to Robot Rights.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethicists, policy-makers, and the general public have questioned whether artificial entities such as robots warrant rights or other forms of moral consideration. There is little synthesis of the research on this topic so far. We identify 294 relevant research or discussion items in our literature review of this topic. There is widespread agreement among scholars that some artificial entities could warrant moral consideration in the future, if not also the present. The reasoning varies, such as concern for the effects on artificial entities and concern for the effects on human society. Beyond the conventional consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethicist ethical frameworks, some scholars encourage "information ethics" and "social-relational" approaches, though there are opportunities for more in-depth ethical research on the nuances of moral consideration of artificial entities. There is limited relevant empirical data collection, primarily in a few psychological studies on current moral and social attitudes of humans towards robots and other artificial entities. This suggests an important gap for psychological, sociological, economic, and organizational research on how artificial entities will be integrated into society and the factors that will determine how the interests of artificial entities are considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.