Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34370023›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2021

Effects of dietary rosemary extract supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, and microbiota of weaning pigs.

Mei Yang, Yexin Yin, Fang Wang, Xuetai Bao, Lina Long, Bie Tan, Yulong Yin, Jiashun Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DietaryAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biological functions and applications of rosemary extracts in animal production.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mei YangAnimal Nutritional Genome and Germplasm Innovation Research Center, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-4474-6803
Yexin YinAnimal Nutritional Genome and Germplasm Innovation Research Center, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, PR China.
Fang WangAnimal Nutritional Genome and Germplasm Innovation Research Center, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, PR China.
Xuetai BaoCAS Key Laboratory of Agro ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Changsha 410125, PR China.
Lina LongSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528231, China.
Bie TanAnimal Nutritional Genome and Germplasm Innovation Research Center, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, PR China.ORCID 0000-0003-0138-1530
Yulong YinAnimal Nutritional Genome and Germplasm Innovation Research Center, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, PR China.
Jiashun ChenAnimal Nutritional Genome and Germplasm Innovation Research Center, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, PR China.
Institute of Subtropical Agriculture · CNHunan Agricultural University · CNFoshan University · CN

Funding

Chinese Academy of Sciences in Hunan Province, China ISA2020112Institute of Subtropical AgricultureInstitute of Subtropical Agriculture ISA2020101Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Processes of Hunan ProvinceOpen Foundation of CAS Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical RegionTeachers' Characteristic Innovation Research Project of Guangdong University Research Findings Commercialzation Center in Guangdong Province, China 2020SWYY02Youth Science Foundation Project of Hunan Agricultural University 19QN01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) extract (RE) has multiple pharmacological and biological activities, including the use as a food additive and medicine. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary RE supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, and microbiota of weaning piglets. A total of 192 crossbred weaned piglets [Duroc × (Large White × Landrace)] (initial body weight = 6.65 ± 0.33 kg, weaned days = 23 ± 1 d) were group housed (six pigs per pen; n = 8 pens/treatment). Pigs were fed a corn-soybean meal-based control diet or the basal diet supplemented with 100, 200, or 400 mg/kg RE. Pigs were allowed ad libitum access to fed for 21 d. The growth performance and apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients, and intestinal morphology and antioxidant status were evaluated. The components of the microbial microflora were also determined in the cecal samples. Compared with the control, dietary supplementation with RE increased the final body weight, average daily gain, and average daily feed intake (linear, P = 0.038, 0.016, and 0.009, respectively), and decreased the diarrhea ratio in piglets (linear, P < 0.05). The digestibility of crude protein (linear, P = 0.034) and gross energy (linear, P = 0.046) increased with treatment with RE. Piglets fed RE showed longer villus height (linear, P = 0.037 and 0.028, respectively) and villus height/crypt depth (linear, P = 0.004 and 0.012; quadratic, P = 0.023 and 0.036, respectively) in the jejunum and ileum, in addition to a lesser crypt depth in the jejunum (linear, P = 0.019) and ileum (quadratic, P = 0.042). The addition of RE increased the activity of superoxide dismutase (linear, P = 0.035 and 0.008, respectively) and glutathione peroxidase activity (linear, P = 0.027 and 0.039, respectively) and decreased the content of malondialdehyde (linear, P = 0.041 and 0.013; quadratic, P = 0.023 and 0.005, respectively) in the serum and liver. Dietary RE supplementation, compared with the control, increased the number of Bifidobacterium (linear, P = 0.034) and Bacteroidetes (linear, P = 0.029), while decreased Escherichia coli (linear, P = 0.008; quadratic, P = 0.014) in the cecal contents. Thus, dietary RE supplementation can improve growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, and the microbiota in weaned piglets, and 200 mg/kg may be considered the optimum dosage.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaRosmarinusAnimal FeedAnimalsAntioxidantsDietary SupplementsNutrientsPlant ExtractsSwineWeaningAntioxidantsNutrientsPlant Extractsantioxidant capacitygut microbiotanutrient digestibilityrosemary extractweaned piglets

Identifiers

PMID34370023
PMCPMC8420665
OpenAlexW3192325199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.