Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34369638›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology2021

Online bioinformatics teaching practice: Comparison of popular docking programs using SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD-ACE2 complex as a benchmark.

Wenxuan Fan, Jun Mencius, Wenjing Du, Huangyunxian Fan, Hongjin Zhu, Dongzhi Wei, Mian Zhou, Shu Quan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Online bioinformatics teaching practice: Comparison of popular docking programs using SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD-ACE2 complex as a benchmark.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenxuan FanSchool of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, PR China.ORCID 0000-0003-3932-1808
Jun MenciusSchool of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, PR China.ORCID 0000-0001-5959-4737
Wenjing DuSchool of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-8533-1401
Huangyunxian FanSchool of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, PR China.
Hongjin ZhuSchool of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, PR China.
Dongzhi WeiSchool of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, PR China.
Mian ZhouSchool of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, PR China.ORCID 0000-0003-4226-6299
Shu QuanSchool of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-6672-4947
East China University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31661143021National Natural Science Foundation of China 31670802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this information era, there is an urgent need for tighter integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology. The enormous amount of data generated by biological experiments calls for extensive computational analysis. Many bioinformatics textbooks at present mainly focus on theories, which hinders the vigorous development of scientific research. As a result, most students are simply familiar with the bioinformatics theories but lack the opportunity to put them into practice. Here, we present our bioinformatics docking project conducted during the self-isolation period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Five students used the RBD-ACE2 complex as a benchmark to conduct a systematic comparison of several open-source online molecular docking programs. The virus surface spike protein mediates the entry of the SARS-CoV-2 virus into human cells by binding to its receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), through its receptor-binding domain (RBD). Through docking and comparing predicted structures to the crystal structure, students gained the opportunity to practice different bioinformatics tools independently and conduct research collaboratively. It opens a window for students to reach out to the state-of-the-art bioinformatics techniques and to keep up with the research trends. The online workshop has also proven to be an innovative method for bioinformatics teaching. We hope our work can inspire other educators to develop strategies to expose undergraduate students to modern bioinformatics and turn every temporary difficulty into a possible learning opportunity.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Binding SitesComputational BiologyHumansMolecular Docking SimulationProtein ConformationSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2COVID-19molecular dockingprotein complexSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34369638
PMCPMC8426971
OpenAlexW3187828006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.