Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34369632›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2022

Frequency and prediction of persistent urinary tract dilation in third trimester and postnatal urinary tract dilation in infants following diagnosis in second trimester.

C A Green, J C Adams, W H Goodnight, A O Odibo, B Bromley, J E Jelovsek, D M Stamilio, K K Venkatesh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antenatally detected urinary tract dilatation: long-term outcome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C A GreenDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J C AdamsDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
W H GoodnightDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
A O OdiboDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-450X
B BromleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Diagnostic Ultrasound Associates, Boston, MA, USA.
J E JelovsekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
D M StamilioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
K K VenkateshDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8043-556X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the frequency, associated characteristics and prognostic value of the current risk stratification system for prenatal urinary tract dilation (UTD) for predicting persistent UTD in the third trimester and subsequent postnatal UTD in the infant, following diagnosis in the second trimester.

methodsThis was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral UTD in the second trimester (before 28 weeks' gestation) with follow-up in the third trimester (at or after 28 weeks) between January 2017 and May 2019. In all cases, the prenatal diagnosis and stratification to low-risk (Grade A1) or increased-risk (Grade A2-3) UTD was made using the 2014 UTD consensus classification system. The primary outcomes included persistent prenatal UTD in the third trimester and postnatal UTD up to 6 months of age. We performed multivariable analysis to assess whether patient and second- and third-trimester sonographic characteristics (such as UTD laterality, other renal abnormality (calyceal dilation, abnormal parenchymal appearance, abnormal ureter or bladder) and anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter (AP-RPD)) were associated with the study outcomes. We assessed the predictive value of the current risk stratification system (Grade A1 vs Grade A2-3) in the second and third trimesters for persistent prenatal UTD and postnatal UTD using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC).

resultsOf 26 620 second-trimester ultrasound assessments in the study period, 347 patients were diagnosed with UTD in the second trimester and had third-trimester follow-up, of whom 150/347 (43% (95% CI, 38-49%)) had persistent UTD in the third trimester. Among the 282/347 (81%) patients with postnatal follow-up available, the frequency of postnatal UTD was 49/282 (17% (95% CI, 13-22%)), and among the subset with persistent UTD in the third trimester, the frequency of postnatal UTD was 46/102 (45% (95% CI, 35-55%)). The most frequent postnatal diagnosis was transient UTD (76%), followed by duplicated collecting system (10%). Of infants originally diagnosed with UTD in the second trimester, 2% (7/347) required surgery; stated differently, of the 49 infants with postnatal UTD, 14% (7/49) required surgery. At second-trimester diagnosis, sonographic predictors of both persistent prenatal UTD and postnatal UTD included the presence of other renal abnormality and UTD Grade A2-3. At third-trimester follow-up, predictors of postnatal UTD were larger mean AP-RPD and UTD Grade A2-3, while all cases had other renal abnormality. Second-trimester diagnosis of UTD Grade A2-3 had satisfactory discrimination for predicting persistent prenatal UTD (AUC, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.70)) and postnatal UTD (AUC, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.81)), as did third-trimester UTD Grade A2-3 for predicting postnatal UTD (AUC, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.76)).

conclusionsThe majority of cases of prenatal UTD did not result in postnatal UTD, and of those that did, very few required surgery. Follow-up third-trimester assessment after a second-trimester diagnosis of UTD is warranted. The current risk stratification system by UTD grade, based on the 2014 UTD consensus classification, can be used to predict postnatal UTD with fair accuracy. Further research is needed to determine whether the predictive performance of this system can be improved by incorporating additional risk factors. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

HydronephrosisUrinary TractDilatationFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondPregnancy Trimester, ThirdRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, Prenatalhydronephrosisprenatal diagnosispyelectasisultrasoundurinary tract dilation

Identifiers

PMID34369632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.