Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34369615›Full record

Observational studyJournal of nursing management2021

Prevalence and reasons for non-nursing tasks as perceived by nurses: Findings from a large cross-sectional study.

Silvia Grosso, Jessica Longhini, Saverio Tonet, Ines Bernard, Jacopo Corso, Denis de Marchi, Laura Dorigo, Gianluca Funes, Massimo Lussu, Nicolas Oppio and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of nursing management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Professional Nurses Engagement in Non-Nursing Work? An Examination of Reasons and Outcomes.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia GrossoOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Jessica LonghiniDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Saverio TonetOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Ines BernardOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Jacopo CorsoOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Denis de MarchiOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Laura DorigoOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Gianluca FunesOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Massimo LussuOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Nicolas OppioOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Luca GrassettiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Luigi Pais Dei MoriOrdine delle Professioni Infermieristiche, Belluno, Italy.
Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3508-844X
University of Palermo · ITUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

Federazione Nazionale Ordini delle Professioni Infermieristiche, FNOPI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study is to describe the prevalence and reasons for non-nursing tasks as perceived by nurses.

backgroundFour types of non-nursing tasks have been identified to date: (a) auxiliary; (b) administrative, (c) expected by allied health care professionals; and (d) medical. However, no studies on a large scale have been performed with the aim of identifying the prevalence of all of these non-nursing tasks, and factors promoting or hindering their occurrence, given that they represent a clear waste of nurses' time.

methodsA cross-sectional study in 2017, following The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies. All active nurses registered in an Italian provincial Nursing Board (=1331) willing to participate were involved. A questionnaire survey exploring the nature of the nursing tasks performed in daily practice and the underlying reasons was administered via paper/pencil and e-mail.

resultsA total of 733 nurses participated of which 94.5% performed at least one type of non-nursing task, mainly administrative and auxiliary. Auxiliary tasks are less likely among nurses working in a community (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.63, p < .01) or in a residential (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.72, p < .01) setting, in critical (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.54, p < .01) or surgical (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.75, p < .01) hospital settings, and when they deal with unexpected clinical events (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p < .01). Greater adequacy of nursing resources decreases the occurrence of auxiliary tasks (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p < .01), whereas the need to compensate for a lack of resources (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07-1.93, p < .01) increases it.

conclusionsAround one-third of shift time is devoted to non-nursing tasks; working in a hospital, in medical units, with lack of resources and with patients with predictable clinical conditions might increase the occurrence of auxiliary tasks. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Strategies to increase the time available for nursing care should consider the type of tasks performed by nurses, their antecedents and the value added to care in terms of patient' benefits.

Indexed as

NursesNursing CareNursing Staff, HospitalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnairesclinical competenceinterprofessional worknon-nursing tasknursingnursing staff

Identifiers

PMID34369615
PMCPMC9291208
OpenAlexW3191526395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.