SynthesisUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2022
First-trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.
- The risk of congenital malformations and neonatal outcomes among singletons and twins born after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-regression analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- A Practical Approach to Incorporating the Detailed First Trimester Ultrasound Examination Into Clinical Practice.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Guideline
- Clinical and cost-effectiveness of detailed anomaly ultrasound screening in the first trimester: a mixed-methods study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Robust meta-analysis for large-scale genomic experiments based on an empirical approach.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Pooled it
- First-Trimester Assessment of the Extended Fetal Cardiovascular System Using the CASSEAL 3 × 3 Framework: Feasibility, Reproducibility and Diagnostic Performance.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Early Detection of Major Fetal Structural Anomalies in the First Trimester: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in an Unselected Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence model based on the detection of key anatomical structures for identifying standard planes on ultrasound of the first-trimester fetal central nervous system: a multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- The Three-Y and Trachea View (3Y + T): A Conceptual Extension of the Three-Vessel and Trachea View for Comprehensive Fetal Echocardiographic Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- First- and Second-Trimester Cardiovascular Anomalies in Trisomy 21 Fetuses: Anatomy, Embryology, Genetics and Imaging.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Current status and prospects of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of congenital heart disease in fetuses: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- TLEUDS: a cascade Dual-Transfer learning system with quality- and knowledge-enhanced for precise fetal CHD screening.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of congenital heart defects in live births: findings from a study in Southern Brazil.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of major cardiac defects through routine early pregnancy ultrasound examination.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Discrepancy between medical knowledge and clinical reasoning: evaluating large language models in prenatal diagnosis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Color doppler in first-trimester congenital heart disease screening: A decade of clinical insights.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- Combining Detailed Fetal Anatomy Scanning in the NT Window Versus Early Second Trimester Scanning at 14-16 Weeks: A Non-Inferiority Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- An interpretable deep learning model for first-trimester fetal cardiac screening.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Intelligent quality control for first trimester ultrasound scans in Liaoning Province of China.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of first-trimester ultrasound on early detection of major fetal anomalies: Nationwide population-based study of over 1 million pregnancies.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Color Doppler Patterns' Recognition Indicative of Congenital Heart Defects at the First-Trimester Referral Scan.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound at 11-14 weeks' gestation in the detection of fetal cardiac abnormalities and to evaluate factors that impact the detection rate.
methodsThis was a systematic review of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of fetal cardiac anomalies at 11-14 weeks' gestation, performed by two independent reviewers. An electronic search of four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and The Cochrane Library) was conducted for studies published between January 1998 and July 2020. Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating pregnancies at any prior level of risk and in any healthcare setting were eligible for inclusion. The reference standard used was the detection of a cardiac abnormality on postnatal or postmortem examination. Data were extracted from the included studies to populate 2 × 2 tables. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model in order to determine the performance of first-trimester ultrasound in the detection of major cardiac abnormalities overall and of individual types of cardiac abnormality. Data were analyzed separately for high-risk and non-high-risk populations. Preplanned secondary analyses were conducted in order to assess factors that may impact screening performance, including the imaging protocol used for cardiac assessment (including the use of color-flow Doppler), ultrasound modality, year of publication and the index of sonographer suspicion at the time of the scan. Risk of bias and quality assessment were undertaken for all included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.
resultsThe electronic search yielded 4108 citations. Following review of titles and abstracts, 223 publications underwent full-text review, of which 63 studies, reporting on 328 262 fetuses, were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In the non-high-risk population (45 studies, 306 872 fetuses), 1445 major cardiac anomalies were identified (prevalence, 0.41% (95% CI, 0.39-0.43%)). Of these, 767 were detected on first-trimester ultrasound examination of the heart and 678 were not detected. First-trimester ultrasound had a pooled sensitivity of 55.80% (95% CI, 45.87-65.50%), specificity of 99.98% (95% CI, 99.97-99.99%) and positive predictive value of 94.85% (95% CI, 91.63-97.32%) in the non-high-risk population. The cases diagnosed in the first trimester represented 63.67% (95% CI, 54.35-72.49%) of all antenatally diagnosed major cardiac abnormalities in the non-high-risk population. In the high-risk population (18 studies, 21 390 fetuses), 480 major cardiac anomalies were identified (prevalence, 1.36% (95% CI, 1.20-1.52%)). Of these, 338 were detected on first-trimester ultrasound examination and 142 were not detected. First-trimester ultrasound had a pooled sensitivity of 67.74% (95% CI, 55.25-79.06%), specificity of 99.75% (95% CI, 99.47-99.92%) and positive predictive value of 94.22% (95% CI, 90.22-97.22%) in the high-risk population. The cases diagnosed in the first trimester represented 79.86% (95% CI, 69.89-88.25%) of all antenatally diagnosed major cardiac abnormalities in the high-risk population. The imaging protocol used for examination was found to have an important impact on screening performance in both populations (P < 0.0001), with a significantly higher detection rate observed in studies using at least one outflow-tract view or color-flow Doppler imaging (both P < 0.0001). Different types of cardiac anomaly were not equally amenable to detection on first-trimester ultrasound.
conclusionsFirst-trimester ultrasound examination of the fetal heart allows identification of over half of fetuses affected by major cardiac pathology. Future first-trimester screening programs should follow structured anatomical assessment protocols and consider the introduction of outflow-tract views and color-flow Doppler imaging, as this would improve detection rates of fetal cardiac pathology. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.