Observational studyCritical care medicine2022
Dielectric Blood Coagulometry for the Early Detection of Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Critical care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the utility of dielectric blood coagulometry for early sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis.
designSingle-center, prospective observational study.
settingPatients with sepsis or septic shock at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine between September 2019 and September 2020. PATIENTS: The patients were divided into three groups according to the timing of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis based on the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine: 1) no disseminated intravascular coagulation group, 2) late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation group: not diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation on day 1 but diagnosed within 48 hours after admission, and 3) disseminated intravascular coagulation group: diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation on day 1. The study evaluated 80 patients (no disseminated intravascular coagulation, 31 [38.8%]; late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation, 34 (42.5%); disseminated intravascular coagulation, 15 [18.8%]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe compared the clinical severity scores and mortality of the groups and assessed the correlation between the dielectric blood coagulometry-derived coagulation marker, thrombin levels, and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score using Spearman rank correlation. The mortality rate was 0% (0/31) in the no disseminated intravascular coagulation group, 35.3% (12/34) in the late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation group, and 33.3% (5/15) in the disseminated intravascular coagulation group. Although the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score on day 1 did not reflect disseminated intravascular coagulation in approximately 70% of patients who developed disseminated intravascular coagulation by day 2, dielectric clot strength measured by dielectric blood coagulometry on day 1 strongly correlated with disseminated intravascular coagulation development by day 2 (Spearman ρ = 0.824; p < 0.05) and with thrombin level on day 1 (Spearman ρ = 0.844; p < 0.05).
conclusionsDielectric blood coagulometry can be used to detect early-phase disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with sepsis and is strongly correlated with thrombin levels. Larger studies are needed to verify our results for developing clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.