ArticleRenal failure2021
Value of quantitative ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting low bone mineral density in hemodialysis.
Article in Renal failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toe Grasp Strength and Its Association with Muscle Mass and Calcaneal Bone Status in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2026Article
- Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are highly predisposed to low bone mineral density (BMD). This study aims to assess the value of quantitative ultrasound (QUS), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and their combination in detecting high-risk patients for low BMD in MHD.
methodsPatients' BMD of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone mineral content (BMC) was assessed using BIA. Calcaneal BMD was measured using QUS. Patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 were recorded as 'low BMD.'
resultsOverall, 93 subjects (62.37% female; mean age, 60.8 ± 16.2 years) were included in this cross-sectional study; approximately 36.56% met the 'low BMD' criteria. QUS-T score predicted low BMD with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.738, sensitivity of 70.59%, and specificity of 76.27%. The AUC for low BMD diagnosis using the BMC index (BMCI) measured through BIA was 0.679 (sensitivity, 91.18%; specificity, 38.98%). On the other hand, the combination of QUS-T score and BMCI yielded a higher AUC value of 0.762 with an improved specificity of 88.14%. Compared with the QUS and BIA alone, the net reclassification improvement (NRI) of the combination model increased by 47.16% (
conclusionThe combination of QUS and BIA is effective in screening for low BMD among MHD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.