Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34369166›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Colchicine in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Thomas Kofler, Reto Kurmann, Dirk Lehnick, Giacomo Maria Cioffi, Sujay Chandran, Adrian Attinger-Toller, Stefan Toggweiler, Richard Kobza, Federico Moccetti, Florim Cuculi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Colchicine-Phoenix from the ashes].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Efficacy and safety of drugs in residual cardiovascular risk: A systematic review of the literature.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas KoflerCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Reto KurmannCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Dirk LehnickDepartment of Biostatistics and Methodology CTU-CS University of Lucerne Lucerne Switzerland.
Giacomo Maria CioffiCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Sujay ChandranRoyal Sussex County Hospital Sussex Worthing United Kingdom.
Adrian Attinger-TollerCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Stefan ToggweilerCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Richard KobzaCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Federico MoccettiCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Florim CuculiCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Sanjit S JollyMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Matthias BossardCardiology Division Heart Center Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland.
Luzerner Kantonsspital · CHHamilton Health Sciences · CARoyal Sussex County Hospital · GBUniversity of Lucerne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Inflammation plays a pivotal role in coronary artery disease (CAD). The anti-inflammatory drug colchicine seems to reduce ischemic events in patients with CAD. So far there is equipoise about its safety and impact on mortality. Methods and Results To evaluate the utility of colchicine in patients with acute and chronic CAD, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and conference abstracts were searched from January 1975 to October 2020. Randomized trials assessing colchicine compared with placebo/standard therapy in patients with CAD were included. Data were combined using random-effects models. The reliability of the available data was tested using trial sequential analyses . Of 3108 citations, 13 randomized trials (n=13 125) were included. Colchicine versus placebo/standard therapy in patients with CAD reduced risk of myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.90;

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsColchicineCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsColchicinecolchicinecoronary artery diseaseinflammationmyocardial infarctionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34369166
PMCPMC8475038
OpenAlexW3190449790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.